>That's not entirely ideal, since it assumes a consistent on-disk naming

>format. That works fine for us, but wouldn't work so well in the
general 
>case. It'd be nice not to make these assumptions, especially since the 
>version numbers are contained within the kernel header.

I think we should get the release and version number from snap-shot
image but the kernel image.
If we can not make sure that there is not a consistent on-disk naming
format. We must designate the system.map file. So in order to support
the multi-boot system, user must select which system.map will be used
each time before system begins to resume.
In fact, we have already make assumption that the system.map file must
be there. If we take general case into account, it is also possible that
the file may do not exist on some system especially some embedded
system. Above all, the file is not necessary for system booting. 


-- 
Ubuntu-mobile mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile

Reply via email to