On 09/21/2010 10:31 AM, Eric Miao wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan...@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Bader >> <stefan.ba...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> On 09/20/2010 07:39 PM, Tobin Davis wrote: >>>> Just out of curiosity, why not use the same kernel as in Lucid? They >>>> are the same base kernel, just built for different HW (armv6+vfp vs >>>> armv7). >>> >>> We could and that would be done by moving the code back from the Lucid repo >>> to >>> the Karmic repo (in order to make kernels for a release be in the release >>> repo). >>> But frankly, even this being not a big issue to do, I do not really want to >>> spend any effort on something that is not used. And if every development and >>> project has moved to Lucid, why bother? >>> >>> Ike, are you aware of any Karmic arm project for OEM that use the fsl-imx51 >>> branch there? >>> >> >> I agree to drop this support in karmic for fsl-imx51. No OEM project >> is based on Karmic fsl-imx51. >> > > There is no known OEM project based on Karmic mvl-dove as well. > > And if Lucid kernel can support Karmic user-space out of the box, I > would vote for drop mvl-dove in karmic kernel as well. > The small difference for mvl-dove is that this actually is 2.6.31 in Karmic and 2.6.32 in Lucid, while fsl-imx51 is 2.6.31 in both cases but has different patchsets on top of it.
-Stefan > And Cc'ed David to see the impact from biz perspective? > >> Thanks, >> -Bryan >> -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
