On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Bryan Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Bader > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 09/20/2010 07:39 PM, Tobin Davis wrote: >>> Just out of curiosity, why not use the same kernel as in Lucid? They >>> are the same base kernel, just built for different HW (armv6+vfp vs >>> armv7). >> >> We could and that would be done by moving the code back from the Lucid repo >> to >> the Karmic repo (in order to make kernels for a release be in the release >> repo). >> But frankly, even this being not a big issue to do, I do not really want to >> spend any effort on something that is not used. And if every development and >> project has moved to Lucid, why bother? >> >> Ike, are you aware of any Karmic arm project for OEM that use the fsl-imx51 >> branch there? >> > > I agree to drop this support in karmic for fsl-imx51. No OEM project > is based on Karmic fsl-imx51. >
There is no known OEM project based on Karmic mvl-dove as well. And if Lucid kernel can support Karmic user-space out of the box, I would vote for drop mvl-dove in karmic kernel as well. And Cc'ed David to see the impact from biz perspective? > Thanks, > -Bryan > -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
