On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 08:30:31PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Thanks Steve for reviewing and merging the changes!
> Since that landed I also went ahead and converted that one > https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive-scripts/+git > If that's ok with others should we also deprecate the corresponding bzr > repository? Outstanding MPs for +junk branches are obviously not an issue, but for u-a-scripts there's: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-scripts/trunk/+activereviews still awaiting feedback from another AA. > There is a checkout on ubuntu-archive-toolbox with some local delta (are > those changes still needed? could they be pushed to the vcs?) which I can > switch (reapplying the local changes for now) I think all of those changes are mine. Some of them are from the server migration and should definitely be landed. I do not remember why I made the change to background_wait behavior and I should probably try to remember rather than just dropping the change (considering how long it's been cowboyed in production). Let's settle some of these changes out on the existing bzr branch before switching it to git, please. > Le 05/07/2023 à 18:31, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > - https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/sync-blocklist.txt exists, so > > landing the ubuntu-archive-tools changes (including the checkout on > > ubuntu-archive-toolbox) > > - pushed the breadcrumb to the old bzr branch > > > > Thanks, > -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
