On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:07:18AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Kevin Day wrote:
>> Is there a reason the following: >> http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-May/019349.html >> was not fixed in this version? > may be lack of time for reviewing and testing ? > >> I seem to remember a cleaned up version of my fix being applied. > I don't think so... but I may be wrong. Fixed in r23853. Thanks! _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
