Il 20 settembre 2013 08:41:25 Rich Felker <dal...@aerifal.cx> ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Khem Raj, > On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent > > > release schedule, to more easily allow downstream users to benefit > > > from improvements/fixes. > > > I think, if we decide to do releases biannually maintaining branches > > for long time can be avoided. To get started I think lets start by > > planning for a 0.9.34 and then everyone sending the pending patches > > for subsequent 0.9.35 and so on. > Since I'm not a uClibc contributor, it's certainly quite easy for me to > just speak, but I would like to advocate for a time-based release > schedule. I believe that for many projects, time-based release > schedules create a rhythm, that provides well-known deadlines and > encourages the entire community to meet those deadlines. Agreed. Time-based release schedule has worked very well for musl, too, but with much shorter release intervals, usually 1-2 months.
I agree too but 1 or 2 is too short IMO. A 3 month schedule would be better.
Rich
Carmelo
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Inviato con AquaMail per Android http://www.aqua-mail.com _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
