Rick McGowan wrote on 06/26/2003 05:52:32 PM:

> The *best* thing to do, in my personal opinion and I know it'll get shot 
 
> down so don't bother telling me so, is to fix the combining classes of 
the 
> Hebrew points.

In discussing these issues among Biblical Hebrew implementers, content 
providers and users, I have had to explain repeatedly why UTC doesn't want 
to consider this. It is completely obvious to them that this is the right 
solution. Even on explaining the impact on normalization, the response is 
that there is no impact since implementations and content using Unicode do 
not yet exist.

(And then, on the other side, I'm asked to explain why other solutions are 
kludges? Two different worlds with completely different sets of 
assumptions.)


 
> Since the combining classes can't be fixed because we have the 
> normalization-stability albatross firmly down our gullets and will 
forever 
> be choking on that, the next best thing is to use a ZWJ. Problem solved. 
 
> Just document it.

I think it would be better to create a new character for this purpose than 
to use ZWJ in yet another way.



- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485


Reply via email to