At 02:53 AM 6/27/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

ISO: Then, obviously they need to correct their errors. I mean, it's not
like the wrong characters got encoded or something. Tell them to just fix
the errors; that can't be difficult to do, and is obviously the right
thing to do.

That seems to be exactly what Michael 'as a member of WG2' is saying.


What if the request to change the Hebrew combining classes came *from* W3C and/or IETF? I'm not saying that this is likely, but I'm wondering whether they might, in fact, not insist on stability for characters for which normalisation is currently broken anyway?

John Hudson

Tiro Typeworks          www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you browse in the shelves that, in American bookstores,
are labeled New Age, you can find there even Saint Augustine,
who, as far as I know, was not a fascist. But combining Saint
Augustine and Stonehenge -- that is a symptom of Ur-Fascism.
                                                            - Umberto Eco




Reply via email to