Great!

2015-02-04 16:30 GMT+08:00 Genc, Ömer <oemer.g...@iais.fraunhofer.de>:

>  Hey,
>
>
>
> i solved that problem. The issue is related to activemq, at least in my
> case. When deploying my artifact I used a custom deployment plan for the
> resource adapter, in which I configured my activemq broker. The
> –schedulersupport- for this broker must be disabled.
>
> See this thread for more information:
>
>
>
>
> http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Problem-starting-geronimo-ActiveMQ-td1563093.html
>
>
>
> Be aware that you might have to change it  at two different places, first
> in the deployment plan you might use to deploy your artifact and second in
> the global activemq configuration of Geronimo. I missed the config in my
> deployment plan.
>
> In my case the deployment plan containing the configuration of the
> resource adapter of the broker looks something like this:
>
>
>
> …
>
> <conn:resourceadapter-instance>
>
>                                   <conn:resourceadapter-name>
> jms/config/resources</conn:resourceadapter-name>
>
>                                   <conn:config-property-setting name=
> *"ServerUrl"*>vm:broker:/DefaultActiveMQBroker?broker.create=yes&amp;
> broker.schedulerSupport=false&amp;broker.useShutdownHook=false&amp;
> async=false&amp;network=true&amp;jms.watchTopicAdvisories=false&amp;
> jms.copyMessageOnSend=false&amp;jms.persistent=false</
> conn:config-property-setting>
>
> …
>
>                            </conn:resourceadapter-instance>
>
> …
>
>
>
> Note the -broker.schedulerSupport=false- setting.
>
>
>
> The global activemq configuration can be found in
> $GERONIMO_HOME/repository/org/apache/Geronimo/configs/activemq-broker-blueprint/3.0.1/activemq-broker-blueprint-3.0.1.car/OSGI-INF/blueprint
>
>
>
> Maybe it helps somebody.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Oemer
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Zhi Xie [mailto:daxie...@gmail.com]
> *Gesen**det:* Dienstag, 3. Februar 2015 10:25
> *An:* user@geronimo.apache.org
> *Betreff:* Re: LifecycleException on startup after server crash
>
>
>
> I have met the sample issue before. As you said it could be resolved by
> deleting the artifact in server's repository. But if you want to get the
> root cause, I suggest to get the debug log when you meet the issue again.
> We can find more information. As I know it is a classloading and dependency
> problem in the most of these issue.
>
>
>
> 2015-01-27 22:15 GMT+08:00 Kevin Huntly <kmhun...@gmail.com>:
>
> I don't know if anyone has responded yet... when it crashes and then the
> ear fails, what causes the crash? Any exceptions?
>
> It looks to me like Geronimo may have a bad cache following the event and
> that's what's causing the break, but I'm not sure. I've seen it happen on
> websphere, although with obviously different messages. Tomcat also gives me
> problems like this, where if there is an issue it will simply delete the
> entire war file and any related contents.
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> Kevin Huntly
> 79 Aurora Drive
> Cheektowaga, NY 14215
> Email: kmhun...@gmail.com
> Cell: (716) 341-5669
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinhuntly
> ________________________________________________
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 1.0
> GCS/IT d+ s a C++ UL+++$ P+(++) L+++ E---
> W+++ N+ o K(+) w--- O- M-- V-- PS+ PE Y(+)
> PGP++(+++) t+ 5-- X-- R+ tv+ b++  DI++ D++
> G++ e(+) h--- r+++ y+++*
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
> On Jan 23, 2015 3:57 AM, "Genc, Ömer" <oemer.g...@iais.fraunhofer.de>
> wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
>
>
> i am having problems with deploying my artifacts on geronimo server after
> the server crashed.
>
> I am using Geronimo 3.0.1. When starting with a fresh geronimo
> installation, my ear can be deployed and works correctly.
>
> However, if the module is already deployed on the server and the server
> crashes, the server has problems starting up again.
>
> The reason for this is my ear. On startup the server fails with the
> following exception, while trying to load my ear:
>
>
>
> *org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.LifecycleException*: load of
> TEST/com.name.ear/1.0/ear failed
>
>        at
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfiguration(
> *SimpleConfigurationManager.java:316*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.system.main.EmbeddedDaemon.doStartup(
> *EmbeddedDaemon.java:234*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.system.main.EmbeddedDaemon.execute(
> *EmbeddedDaemon.java:94*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.system.osgi.BootActivator$1.execute(
> *BootActivator.java:107*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.main.Bootstrapper.start(
> *Bootstrapper.java:88*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.main.Bootstrapper.execute(
> *Bootstrapper.java:61*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(
> *AbstractCLI.java:65*)
>
>        at org.apache.geronimo.cli.daemon.DaemonCLI.main(
> *DaemonCLI.java:33*)
>
> Caused by: *org.osgi.framework.BundleException*: The bundle "
> TEST.com.name.ear_1.0.0 [378]" could not be resolved. Reason: Missing
> Constraint: Import-Package: org.osgi.service.prefs; version="[1.1.1,1.1.1]"
>
>        at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.AbstractBundle.getResolverError(
> *AbstractBundle.java:1327*)
>
>        at
> org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.AbstractBundle.getResolutionFailureException(
> *AbstractBundle.java:1311*)
>
>        at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.BundleHost.startWorker(
> *BundleHost.java:323*)
>
>        at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.internal.core.AbstractBundle.start(
> *AbstractBundle.java:299*)
>
>        at
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.SimpleConfigurationManager.loadConfiguration(
> *SimpleConfigurationManager.java:311*)
>
>        ... 7 more
>
>
>
> Restarting the server does not solve the problem. The only way to solve
> this is to manually delete the artifact from the repository using the
> command line or the file system.
>
> However, this is a no-op for me. Can anyone give me an advice, where to
> look and why the server has problems loading my ear on startup?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Oemer
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards
> Gary
>



-- 
Best Regards
Gary

Reply via email to