Hi, > -----Message d'origine----- > De : ssiv...@gmail.com [mailto:ssiv...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : jeudi 27 mars 2014 10:41 > À : user@cassandra.apache.org > Objet : Re: Which hector version is suitable for cassandra 2.0.6 ? > > On 03/27/2014 12:23 PM, user 01 wrote: > > Btw both Hector & Datastax java driver are maintained by Datastax, & > > both for java, this speaks for itself ! > I'm not sure about the first statement. What do you mean at the second part > of the sentence? > They are Java-based, but has different API (and I find DS and Astyanax API > quite more convenient that the Hector's one). They are also can be > fine-grained configured. > Astyanax performance is about the same to DS (astx now about 5-10% faster), > what I cannot say about Hector. And the main difference is that the DS > supports C* v2 with cql3, prepared statements, its navite binary > protocol > and other features. For example, using Astyanax versus DS on C* v2 shows > unstable results under the high-load.
Which one shows unstable results under the high-load ? Astyanax ? DS ? Thanks. Dominique > Also, CQL is now deprecated and in the future the move is towards CQL3 and > thus the DataStax driver recommended for future development. > Astyanax working on the facade API so, I guess, it will be possible to change > the raw level driver in some cases. > > -- > Thanks, > Serj
