Thanks Sankalp, we are also reviewing our internal 2.1 list against what you published (though we are trying to upgrade everyone to later versions e.g. 2.2). It's great to compare notes.
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 16:19 sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is awesome. I have send out the patches which we back ported into 2.1 > on the dev list. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, kurt Greaves <k...@instaclustr.com> > wrote: > > > On 19 October 2016 at 21:07, sfesc...@gmail.com <sfesc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If > not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited. > > > There has certainly been discussion regarding the tick-tock cadence, and > it seems safe to say it will change. There hasn't been any official > announcement yet, however. > > Kurt Greaves > k...@instaclustr.com > www.instaclustr.com > > > -- Ben Bromhead CTO | Instaclustr <https://www.instaclustr.com/> +1 650 284 9692 Managed Cassandra / Spark on AWS, Azure and Softlayer
