I will also publish 3.0 back ports once we are running 3.0 On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ben Bromhead <b...@instaclustr.com> wrote:
> Thanks Sankalp, we are also reviewing our internal 2.1 list against what > you published (though we are trying to upgrade everyone to later versions > e.g. 2.2). It's great to compare notes. > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 16:19 sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is awesome. I have send out the patches which we back ported into >> 2.1 on the dev list. >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, kurt Greaves <k...@instaclustr.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> On 19 October 2016 at 21:07, sfesc...@gmail.com <sfesc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems >> to be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If >> not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited. >> >> >> There has certainly been discussion regarding the tick-tock cadence, and >> it seems safe to say it will change. There hasn't been any official >> announcement yet, however. >> >> Kurt Greaves >> k...@instaclustr.com >> www.instaclustr.com >> >> >> -- > Ben Bromhead > CTO | Instaclustr <https://www.instaclustr.com/> > +1 650 284 9692 > Managed Cassandra / Spark on AWS, Azure and Softlayer >
