On 12/8/11 17:19 , Andres Taylor wrote: >> I'm guessing something like this: >> start ou=node(1234) >> match (ou)-[:CHILD_OU*..100]->(child_ou)<-[:OWNER]-(case) >> where case.status = "CLOSED" >> return avg(case.completionTime) >> >> Question is, will the OU itself be included? Or does this imply that >> there *has* to be a child-OU? > > > That query does imply that there has to be a child-OU. The minimal length > for a path where you haven't specified anything manually is one. You can be > explicit about the fact that children are not needed by saying that min > length of the path is > zero<http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/query-match.html#match-zero-length-paths>.
Ok, so with: >> start ou=node(1234) >> match (ou)-[:CHILD_OU*0..100]->(child_ou)<-[:OWNER]-(case) >> where case.status = "CLOSED" >> return avg(case.completionTime) that would give me what I want? Cool! Especially considering that this was A LOT OF WORK to do with MySQL (current solution), as I had to implemented nested set models and whatnot. If it is as easy as the above, oh man... /Rickard _______________________________________________ NOTICE: THIS MAILING LIST IS BEING SWITCHED TO GOOGLE GROUPS, please register and consider posting at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/neo4j Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
