> The async thing is nice; that would be a good thing to bring into S2. > > I still don't like the string-based action returns; strings are just awful. > I don't have a better solution (yet). > > It might be a good time for me to rethink the code-based config I'd > implemented some time ago, e.g., use a Groovy or whatever DSL to config the > results, that way they end up being code artifacts. > >
Another approach could be to define a Result class to avoid mapping of strings, e.g.: return new Result("dispatch", "test.jsp"); This would keep current result types with all their string-parameters. But it would not be necessary to configure them and no name-matching would take place. Regards, Christoph This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus