Actually, this is [email protected], which according to http://despots.codehaus.org/Project+Mailing+Lists has the following purpose:
The user@ list is intended for user-based discussions of the project. There are two other lists, Xdoclet-Plugins Interest, and Xdoclet-Plugins SCM which I assume would be appropriate for discussion of Xdoclet plugins. What do you mean by "and EJB plugins are not yet released". They are included in the official XDoclet2 1.0.2 release. Is it really true that EJB stuff doesn't work? Why was there even a release of XDoclet2 if these original reason for it's existence isn't working yet? I have read quite a bit of bad press about XDoclet2 that made me wary about upgrading, but I didn't want to mess with the old template language anymore if there was something better. But this is extremely dissappointing and discouraging. Stan -----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 8:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [xdoclet-user] Problem with XDoclet2 --- Stan Guillory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I am trying to move some code from XDoclet 1.2.x to XDoclet2 > 1.0.2. It is not going well. I started simple by just trying to > generate the support files for one EJB. No matter what I write in the > doclet tags, the behavior is always the same: generate four empty > classes, HelloLocal.java, HelloLocalHome.java, HelloRemote.java, and > HelloRemoteHome.java. Here is the body of one of those classes: You are asking on the wrong list... There is a list dedicated to plugins ( and there are plugin developers, especially those who are in charge of EJB stuff ) XDoclet is apparently running, so the problem is inside plugin ( template ) And EJB plugins are not yet released - they are under development. So templates could be just empty. > Any help would be appreciated. I was interested in > XDoclet2 because I > have a lot of custom templating to do and assumed that it would be > easier with XDoclet2, but I can't even get it to do the basic things I > need. It is indeed easier due to better templating engines, and better tag architecture ( self validating , etc. ) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com
