Re: ipv6 dns server.

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Title: Re: ipv6 dns server.

Right, if your ISP doesn’t offer the service, even if via a tunnel, better change to another ISP. There are lots of reliable ISPs today offering the service, and lots of free transition services.

We have our own Tunnel Broker, 6to4 and Teredo. See http://www.ipv6tf.org section 3/connectivity. Also other free services at several countries are cited there.

Regards,
Jordi

---

De: Lawrence Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 04:53:25 +0800
Para: Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <users@ipv6.org>
Conversación: ipv6 dns server.
Asunto: RE: ipv6 dns server.

Wise or not, that is the standard. If you are using an ISP that does not support
IPv6, and don't have tunneled IPv6 service, in most cases, you would not need
to have an IPv6 stack installed on your node. In that case, the "preferred" IPv6
address returned by DNS for a dual stack node (e.g. www.kame.net <http://www.kame.net> ) would be
ignored, as there would be no way to use it on an IPv4 only node.

If you have installed an IPv6 stack, but for some reason, don't have IPv6 access
to the outside world, what typically happens when you get both addresses from
DNS is that the first connection over IPv6 times out then a good connection is
made over IPv4.

Note that in Asia, many ISPs now provide direct IPv6 service. Europe is starting
to migrate. The US is WAY behind in this, and may well lose its lead in the
Internet because of this. China, Japan and Korea may well dominate the next
generation and the US will be a backwater as things are shaping up. The US
government is about the only bright spot at the moment (due to GAO and OMB
mandates). They must migrate by June 2008 (DoD by Feb 2008).

Even in the US, you can get direct IPv6 service from NTT America (nee Verio).
You can get tunneled service over existing IPv4 connections anywhere in the
world (even in the US). See www.hexago.com <http://www.hexago.com>  or Hurricane Electric, among
others (not affiliated with either, but have used both).

Having the IPv6 address be preferred if both v4 and v6 addresses are returned
(but only if the node supports IPv6) is necessary for the smooth migration to
dual stack and later pure IPv6. The only problems occur in situations where
the migration is started but not yet complete (at least to dual stack), then the
worst case is a short timeout before connection.

 

---

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kenneth Porter
Sent: Wed 1/4/2006 2:05 AM
To: users@ipv6.org
Subject: RE: ipv6 dns server.

--On Monday, January 02, 2006 4:02 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Most client computers (DNS resolvers) that support IPv6 will (and should)
> use the IPv6 addresses preferentially over IPv4 when both are returned
> from the DNS.

With most ISP's not providing an IPv6 gateway, is that yet wise? Even
Speakeasy, one of the more technically competent ISP's, doesn't yet provide
native IPv6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.