R-Elists wrote: > > Per, > >> Must be why Marc asked the list too :-) > > so, that is why you responded? > > are you the uninformed, or the unqualified? or both? > > ;->
Nah, I leave that to others. >> >> But seriously, in a case like this, who better to ask than >> the people you are serving? >> > > but seriously, *all* necessary things considered to make a > determination, do the people that one is serving have *all* that it > takes to make that determination... The spam/ham decision is always in the eye of the beholder. One persons spam is another ones ham. /Per Jessen, Zürich
