R-Elists wrote: >> The spam/ham decision is always in the eye of the beholder. >> One persons spam is another ones ham. >> >> >> /Per Jessen, Zürich >> >> > > Per, > > you are right! > > i am seeing you filling out those free credit report URL's > frequently... :-) >
Fortunately, I have yet to see any of those. > so then the On Topic thing is, how do we best deal with them in > Spamassassin... I see no problem in catching them - the OPs question was whether to do so or not, I think. /Per Jessen, Zürich
