I lived in South Africa when that country adopted the metric system.  At the 
time there were two official languages – English and Afrikaans.    When I was 
at school (pre-metric days) I was taught to write the date as “24 March 2016” 
(UK English style), but in Afrikaans we were taught to write “Maart 24 2016” (A 
literal translation of the UK style).  Now put those dates into numbers and you 
get the DD-MM-YYYY vs MM-DD-YYYY confusion.  Bilingualism caused many other 
anomalies -  which was written first “100 vt” or “100 ft” (English first or 
Afrikaans first was part of an on-going political debate).

 

Shortly after the UK announced her metrication program, South Africa announced 
hers.  One of the by-products was standardisation of symbols – ISO 8601 was 
adopted for dates – “2016-03-24” is pretty unambiguous, as is “40 m” for 
distance.  The only thing that was not standardised between English and 
Afrikaans was the use of the dot or the comma as a decimal separator – the 
Dutch and the Germans used the comma and the English the dot. The power-that-be 
(who were rather anti-English) decided to standardise on the comma with the 
result that now, even though English is the de facto lingua franca in a nation 
that has eleven official languages, the comma has remained the official decimal 
separator – the chief advantage being that it is more prominent than the dot. 

 

From: USMA [mailto:usma-boun...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Payne
Sent: 24 March 2016 20:11
Cc: USMA
Subject: [USMA 142] Re: Formatting numbers and the decimal marker

 

South Africa uses the comma as a country regardless of the language of the 
writer. I think the main point (excuse the pun) is getting rid of the comma for 
the thousand separator where it can be confused with the decimal point in a lot 
of languages. The use of the comma or point are optional, it’s the same in the 
USA and probably every other country that is a member of BIPM. I had not 
realised until recently that this standard had been adopted by so many 
countries. Hence 1 000 000,0 or 1 000 000.0.

 

I don’t really care whether it’s a space or a thin space as long as the comma 
is gone. I’ve done this for 30 years in the US and no one has questioned what 
I’ve done. When you think about it Ma Bell decided on the dash for the spacer, 
they could just as easily have written the phone number 201,555,1212 or 
201.555.1212 or 201 555 1212. I think the last one is just as understandable 
and easily read.

 

Mike Payne

 

 

On 22 Mar 2016, at 17:50, John Altounji <phy...@msn.com> wrote:

 

I agree.

 

 

John Altounji
One size does not fit all.
Social promotion ruined Education.

 <http://bit.do/tounj> http://bit.do/tounj

 

From: USMA [mailto:usma-boun...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of 
jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:35 PM
To: Michael Payne <metricmik...@gmail.com>; USMA <usma@colostate.edu>
Subject: [USMA 136] Re: Formatting numbers and the decimal marker

 

In the Preface to the SI Brochure, the BIPM notes that THEY use the point as 
the decimal marker in the English text and the comma in the French text (the 
only two languages they support).

 

I think the logical conclusion is that the English language and 
English-speaking countries use the point, OTHER languages may use the comma.  
To avoid confusion, neither may use either as a thousands divider (at least in 
an SI measurement context), only the space should be used.  I am aware they 
recommend a thin space, but on the Internet, there is a problem.  The Unicode 
non-breaking thin space is unreliable and does not decode in many browsers or 
fonts. I think it would be almost mandatory to use the regular non-breaking 
space.  Also, I think the financial community will not support the space as 
thousands separator, but I support it for SI data.

 

In an English Wikipedia article, the decimal marker should be the point.

 


  _____  


From: Michael Payne <metricmik...@gmail.com>
To: USMA <usma@colostate.edu> 
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 3:56 PM
Subject: [USMA 133] Formatting numbers and the decimal marker

 

I suggested a change to the Wikipedia manual of style the other day. Reading 
some of the comments today I realise I need some support form USMA members who 
in my opinion are all rational people. Go to 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_style  Page down to 
Formatting numbers (the subject above) and read what I have proposed. Please 
support my suggestion.

 

Mike Payne. aka avi8tor.


_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
USMA@colostate.edu
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma




 

_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
USMA@colostate.edu
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma

Reply via email to