At 2:03 AM -0500 5/30/08, Ken Williams wrote: >On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Craig A. Berry ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think it's important that we not apply any more >> patches for M::B to blead until we get things synched up -- the merge >> will just get worse if we put it off. > >I would prefer to not apply any more M::B patches to blead unless >they're integrating from the canonical M::B code.
I think that's the plan. > Sometimes the >bleadkeepers are more responsive than I am, though, so that's likely >why patches are routed there first sometimes... Or sometimes people have an itch to scratch that spans module boundaries or don't know or don't remember to put changes in the module's RT queue first. The only two changes to Module::Build in blead since the beginning of 2008 are: http://public.activestate.com/cgi-bin/perlbrowse/p/33332 http://public.activestate.com/cgi-bin/perlbrowse/p/33340 The first one is already in M::B trunk and the second may not be applicable any more (not sure). I've now at long last put my revision of John's patch in the RT queue here: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=36762 The primary change from what he submitted was to make it against M::B trunk instead of blead. The other thing was that it didn't seem to me we should need to know in Base.pm or Build.pm which make utility is in use since that should only be relevant if running in compatibility mode, so I moved those bits to Compat.pm. -- ________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "... getting out of a sonnet is much more difficult than getting in." Brad Leithauser
