> "In any case, it is nonsensical that when power is cut that output > power quickly momentarily rises." > > > The electric heating power is apparently used to suppress the > reaction, not to enhance it. Others have observed that in some cases > when heater power is cut, anomalous heat rises rapidly. I think there > is no doubt that anomalous heat can rise quite quickly and > uncontrollably with this device, as it did during the 18-hour liquid > flow test in February. There is no doubt that heat burst was real, and > not an instrument artifact.
I can't help but think back to the idea that it's not heat which triggers the reaction, but rather an event which causes the molecules to vibrate at a certain frequency. I think Znidarsic holds this view and, if correct, can identify the frequency needed from the work he's done. If so, then we would see a need for heat to start the reaction, and heat could then also be used to kill the reaction. If the molecules were vibrating faster than an optimum reaction would require, then shutting power down would increase the reaction as the temperature fell to the optimum point, killed only then by the lack of hydrogen. If this idea is correct, then the reaction should be stable and sustainable at a certain temperature and power spikes would be rare and short lived. This might also explain Rossi's 'frequency generator' that appears to be a mystery in this experiment. Craig
