If we have something that quantum mechanically entangles two dissimilar atoms, then these two atoms become the same combined atom at the same location in space. Will their nuclei combine in a fusion reaction?
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/everyday-entanglement In the Lugano test, it looks to me like the 100 micron nickel particle covered with lithium became entangled as a single quantum system. All the nickel and all the lithium became involved in a nuclear fusion reaction, Yes all N atoms in that particle and the lithium that covered it...both Nickel and Lithium...transmuted into pure Ni62 in a single fusion reaction through entanglement. This is the only way that particle could have formed through transmutation. On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why the strong force behaves this way - repulsion at close distance, and > then switching to strong attraction with very short fall-off - is a core > mystery of quantum mechanics and nuclear theory. That having been said, > Don Hotson's analysis of the Dirac's equation as a TOE (theory of > everything) has a very plausible explanation of the strong force, > predicting both the very close repulsion and the strong attraction. This > part of the description is in his 2nd paper, but you will need to read his > first paper to understand the second. > > The strong attraction is an exchange force - sort of like a chemical bond > of electrons, but with the components of the nucleon being shared between > two nucleons. This sharing can only happen at a very small distance. The > exchange force reminds me of the force between a magnet and its iron keeper > - extremely strong at short distance and very weak at longer distance. Not > sure this is a good physics analogy, but it comes to mind as I think about > it. > > I find Hotson's analysis of what Dirac's equation implies to be very > compelling. It really throws conventional quantum mechanics back on its > heels! I have his papers, but there have been links to them several times > in Vortex. > > Bob Higgins > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:10 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > wrote: > >> But why does the force fall off with such a high power relationship with >> respect to separation? If there are more than 3 spatial dimensions then >> some of the acting flux might leak off into those mystery regions. >> Otherwise, I am having a difficult time visualizing why it is not limited >> in a manner similar to that seen with electromagnetic fields. Of course, >> if the effects are explained as a result of experiments then one is left >> with this question unanswered. >> >> Are we using data that is generated by curve fitting to observations as >> compared to understanding the true physical phenomena underlying those >> observations? If true, then there is a limited opportunity available to >> anticipate new, so far unseen, forces that might come into play under new >> conditions. LENR might be one of a family of possibilities waiting to be >> discovered as better instrumentation is developed. Of course, serendipity >> has its place in physics as it has always led to most of the major >> discoveries. It has been said, "I'd rather be lucky than good." >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Fri, Sep 11, 2015 10:32 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:47 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> Does anyone know why this interaction varies as the sixth power of >>> separation? >> >> >> Just to clarify -- the nuclear force is the one that drops off with the >> sixth power (per Robin). The speculative relationship between the >> "interaction half-life" and the separation distance is unknown, although it >> would be great to know what it is. (I was just providing an example of >> what it might be.) >> >> At the scale of nucleons the strong force, called the residual strong >> force, or nuclear force, in this context, is what is left over from the >> interaction of quarks and gluons within nucleons. The nuclear force is >> effective at 1 fm, and the nucleons are bound together within the nucleus >> through the exchange of mesons, which are quite massive. The more massive >> the force carrier, the shorter its range. In contrast to the residual >> strong force, the force carrier of the strong force is the gluon, which is >> massless and interacts with quarks. (Credit for this goes to Wikipedia.) >> >> (I wonder if this means the range of gluons is far, and if not, why not.) >> >> Eric >> >> >
