I had the privilege of standing in the parking lot of the hotel where
Chukanov had his demo running for several hours in the company of Martin
Fleischmann fusing some of our little grey cells over that device. Chukanov
answered or at least responded to every single question we posed to him and
we sent many his way. It was a fascinating and captivating demo. Martin was
the kind of man who had insatiable curiosity and not a mean molecule in his
body and showed it in his sincere interest and professorial manner. Chukanov
sent us both away with several large chunks of his metal. 

Meanwhile the hundreds of ICCF conference attendees almost entirely shunned
the ‘parking lot demo’ and Chukanov, especially the self-appointed high
priest insiders of cold fusion. There was little but derision and snide
attacks behind Chukanov’s back at the meeting. 

After a couple hours in hot afternoon sun with Chukanov and his machine
Martin and I adjorned to the beach and floated for a long time like basking
whales chatting about this and that.  

Somewhere in my collection of ‘cold fusion’ holy treasures I have some of
Chukanov’s SmCo5 metal. I think I will dig it out and see if some of the
recent ‘activation’ ideas make it work even better!

 

From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] 
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 2:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:RE: An experiment you never heard of

 

Aha – so that’s where Dennis Cravens probably got the idea to use SmCo in
his famous NI Week Demo. Notably, samarium has a high percentage of
radioactive isotopes which could be activate by fractional hydrogen.

From: Russ George 

What about the demo of Chukanov at the ICCF meeting in Hawaii many years
ago. In large cylinders crushed and powdered SmCo5, magnetic metal, was
cycled with hydrogen loading and deloading and produced kilowatts of
apparent excess heat!

From: Jones Beene 

… but wait, there’s more… (best Billy Mays’ tin cup plea) 

In another experiment you may not have heard of - from Bockris and
Sundaresan in 1994 - it was shown that magnetic stimulation boosted excess
heat substantially in a Pd-D electrolysis cell. This line of work leads up
to the Letts-Cravens effect – wrt understanding the influence of a magnetic
field on LENR.

“After the cathode had been charged with deuterium for 48 hours at a current
of 80 mA, the cell was placed in the field of a permanent magnet of 200
Gauss strength. The cell electrolyte temperature rose to 5°C  above ambient
after 230 seconds. After 576 seconds, the magnet was replaced by two
Neodymium magnets with a 800 Gauss field. The temperature immediately
started increasing and reached 13.5 °C above ambient in about 15 minutes and
remained constant. The temperature returned when the magnet was removed…
[end of Bockris quote]

The $64 question - why isn’t a magnetic field fully employed in the
glow-stick experiments?  By “fully employed” it is meant that: yes, the
heater wire does provide a minimal field but increasing the field strength
by an order of magnitude could be beneficial.

… relevant comment: those who do not remember the past cannot benefit from
its insight-  paraphrase of famous Santayana quote, which is the logic
behind the LENR-CANR library.

____________________________________________

Reply via email to