a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> No one died because there was only ~20 kW of heat. > > But again, that is not the point I am trying to make. One last time:" > > > Jed I am an engineer who took aeronautics as a subject. I am quite > capable of calculating the air flows and ventilation required. I just > don't think what you write has been proven. > What hasn't been proven? What the hell is your point?!? What are you trying to say? Look, this is really easy: IF there is a 22" vent with a large fan, and if the air temperature in the vent is high, THEN yes, there is 1 MW of heat. We all agree on that. HOWEVER if there is a smaller vent, or the air temperature is low, then there is only ~20 kW of heat. SO the I.H. expert has to investigate the ventilation. Because the flow calorimetry from Rossi shows no heat. Do you understand? Why does this have any connection to your expertise in ventilation? I suppose you would be well qualified to make this measurement, but the point is, Rossi did not allow anyone to make this measurement. So we have no evidence for the 1 MW claim. The only evidence Rossi provided shows conclusively that it did not work. If you are saying it has not been proven that Rossi's calorimetry shows nothing, you happen to be flat-out wrong. I have seen the proof. You have not, so you have no business contradicting me. You should say "I suppose" or "my gut feeling is" . . . Not "I don't think." You have no basis to think anything about anything, yet. You do know for a fact that Rossi refused to let the I.H. expert in. He told you that himself. Why would he block the door if the ventilation proves his 1 MW claim is real? He knew that I.H. disagreed with his 1 MW claim. Anyone with an ounce of sense would disagree! It is ludicrous.You need only glance at the equipment and the data to see it can't possibly be true. The only plausible reason he blocked the door is that it proves he is wrong. - Jed