Few weeks ago in a private mail I had speculated about possibility of a bound state of e- and e+ at a short distance through magnetic interaction different from para/ortho positroniums and if the bond will be stable this would be a candidate for dark matter (WIMP).
The new boson has only 10^-14 second lifetime meanwhile authors wrote: "Such a boson might be a good candidate for the rela- tively light U(1)d gauge boson [2], or the light mediator of the secluded WIMP dark matter scenario [3] or the dark Z (Zd) suggested for explaining the muon anoma- lous magnetic moment [5]. The coupling constant (ǫ 2) of the dark Z having a mass of 18 MeV is predicted to be in the 10−6 range for explaining the g-2 anomaly [5], which could fairly well explain the boson to γ-decay branching ratio measured in the present work. The lifetime of the boson with the above coupling strength is expected to be in the order of 10−14 s [4]. This gives a flight distance of about 30 µm in the present experiment, and would imply a very sharp resonance (Γ ≈ 0.07 eV) in the future e+e− scattering experiments." On 5/26/16, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Imagine a previously unrecognized bosonic nuclear force, somewhat like a > gluon - but which has an associated force which is "protophobic" meaning > that it attracts and binds neutrons, and repels protons. By analogy - this > new force acts like a magnet for neutrons and a diamagnet for protons. > > The new force/particle has received little attention . and since we are > among the first to consider it in all its newfound glory, let's name it > "neuglu" for the obvious reasons. It has a lot of mass-energy - nearly 17 > MeV, and possibly can provide the lost mass needed to account for the > thermal gain seen in LENR. > > The neuglu-boson is thus a range force which can arise between neutrons and > electrons or between small groups of low Z nuclei if the neutron alignment > is correct, since the above description of "protophobia" is eliminates it > from large nuclei. Even so, these groups must present exposed contact zones > of only neutrons, and possibly it adds stability. Plus, it is not easy to > account for why the neuglu boson has been completely unrecognized all these > years - but if SLAC says is so, then I am not going to argue with SLAC. > > To continue, if neuglu is real and it can act between exposed neutrons when > groups geometrically favorable, then it will be found in predictable > circumstances. Such a particle would carry a force that acts over distances > only several times the width of an atomic nucleus and could temporarily > bind > atoms like deuterium ***without fusion*** into agglomerations which mimic > other atoms and provide excess energy on decay. > > Now, imagine a cluster of four deuterons arranged in a tetrahedron, such > that all the four neutrons pointed inward to the focal point of the > arrangement, where the neuglu boson is spatially active. The four protons > point outward - giving a rather pronounced positive near field. We can call > this species beryllium-8, and it is short lived, but ironically the neuglu > may prohibit fusion. Yet, this isomer does not need to decay to alphas and > may instead sequentially form and reform from only UDD. > > Moreover, other neuglu bound nuclei are possible which are longer-lived, > including 10B, 12C, 14N, 16O. Thus - here is a prediction which will > provide > some falsifiability to the premise that neuglu can bind deuterons in a way > that mimics low Z elements. > > > ---------------------------------------------- > One way that the "fifth force" (or sixth, since the fifth force is already > spoken for) could be relevant to LENR relates to Takahashi's TSC theory, or > a revised version of it. This involves a Tetrahedral Symmetric Condensate . > which, of course, has four vertices, or four active components - normally > four deuterons. This is a very stable platonic solid form, and it can look > very much like beryllium-8. > > This is sometimes called cluster fusion since more than two particles are > involved. Four deuterons in the ultradense UDD state could react giving the > fusion product or else the appearance of a 8Be atom which the Hungarians > base everything on. If we want to go beyond Takahashi, fusion is NOT > required -- merely the temporary formation of the tetrahedron, which has > binding energy, followed by its energetic breakup back to deuterons - > courtesy of the fifth force. Implied is asymmetry. > > That is one way to avoid the problem of lack of gamma radiation. Of course > no one knows the expected ash, but if helium is found, then it is real > cluster fusion - but this is highly unlikely IMO and otherwise, there would > be a new type of gain based on 5th force dynamics. > > >