For what it’s worth, my recollection is that the 1/r loss applies to an infinite linear antenna. Thus it’s only an approximation for a real antenna.
As for evanescent waves, I have not seen a measurement of their speed of initiation relative to the distance to the source that generates them. Are the evanescent fields established instantly as part of an entangled (coherent) system? They may be involved in coupling spin/angular momentum quanta exchange between orbital electrons and nuclear entities. The local B field in that it modifies the entangled energy states may be the mouse in the Rossi effect to produce necessary resonances to allow reaction to proceed or to stop reactions by eliminating resonant conditions. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:28 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy I may be remembering wrong, but I believe that the evanescent magnetic field strength falls off as 1/r^3 and the coupled evanescent power falls off as 1/r^6. For the propagating field, the strength of the magnetic field falls off as 1/r in free space and the coupled power falls off as 1/r^2. In cluttered environments, the propagating field falls off more quickly. The insertion loss of the coils is proportional to the loaded Q to unloaded Q ratio. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:55 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > Robin, > > It is my experience that the coupling falls off as 1/r to the third power > at large distances. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2016 12:04 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:The principle of the mutual energy > >For example in my past self resonant coil experiments very efficient > energy > >transfer between two air coils at a distance does not fit to magnetic > coupling > >working for transformers, nor to standard electromagnetic wave > transmission > >despite of presence of substantial electric and magnetic fields. These > fields > >are now known as evanescent waves. May the coupling through evanescent > waves > >have a similarity with the handshake described on this paper. > >OTH, I think self resonant coils (Tesla coils) could not be substituted > by a LC > >tank. Coils can resonate in multiple frequencies at the same time and may > cause > >some odd effects depending to waveshape and to geometry. > >BTW, Imrecons appears specialized in computer tomography. > >http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08710 > > It is also well known that the energy transfer between resonant air coils > drops > off as 1/R rather than 1/R^2. That's why I think it's possible that many so > called free energy experiments actually make use of resonance with the > protons > in the inner Van Allen belt. The resonance wavelength may be about the > same as > the altitude of the inner Van Allen belt for some protons. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
