https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/news/index.php/news/80-Airbus-Defence-Space-filed-a-LENR-patent-for-an-autonomous-reactor-in-september-/
AlainCo <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/User/5-AlainCo/> Mar 22nd 2015 <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/news/index.php/News/80-Airbus-Defence-Space-filed-a-LENR-patent-for-an-autonomous-reactor-in-september-/> states: "The patent really looks like Defkalion claims." This patent sure looks like the Dekalion tech to me. Who would know that tech is extreme detail if it was not Gamberale. If Defkalion "had nothing" then why has AirBus patented that tech? Jed, don't be made a fool of. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gamberale left Defkalion after nine months and has started his own company > to conduct research and development in LENRs, according to his LinkedIn > profile. > > Vandenberghe wrote to *New Energy Times* that “Airbus Group has signed a > letter of intent” to work with his company. In recent weeks, AirBus group > has just patented the Dekalion design. That design had to have come > from Gamberale. Jed, are you acting as a unwitting dupe for these guys? > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> There seems to be a pattern developing in the LENR body politic. The >>> systems integrator discredits the LENR inventor using the same flow meter >>> gambit. >>> >> >> You are talking about Defkalion and Rossi. No one else. There is no >> pattern. It happens that they both used flow meters to commit fraud, but >> Rossi also used several other instruments as well. Details have not yet >> been released. Some of his other tricks contributed more to the fake COP of >> 50 than the flow meter did. >> >> >> Then the systems integrator takes advantage of the IP of the defunct >>> inventor to advance their business prospects. >>> >> >> There is no IP. There is nothing to take advantage of. The claims were >> lies and nonsense, with no value. >> >> >> >>> Jeb seems to support without exception the systems integrator using info >>> provided by the systems integrator involving the flow meter. >>> >> >> "Without exception" meaning in these two cases, and in no other case in >> the history of cold fusion. >> >> >> >>> The IP of the inventor eventually shows up in a patent that the systems >>> integrator has a commercial interest in. >>> >> >> There can be no valid patents. The reactors produce no heat. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
