There are 3 logical possibilities: 1) a.ashfield is a troll, he is doing this just for fun, 2) a.shfield is a shrill paid by Rossi 3) a.shfield is a self-deluded believer of Rossi crackpottery at any cost.
Possible combinations of 1 to 3 are also possible. On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:36 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > It is fairly simple why. The only unbiased observer, the paid expert ERV > Penon, says the plant worked. > Rossi took IH to court, where the facts will be made known, because IH > failed to pay him what they had agreed on. It wasn't IH taking Rossi to > court. You have it backwards. > > > On 8/12/2016 10:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > > What I don't understand is why there are not ongoing criminal > investigations for Rossi, Fabian and Penon, the fraudulent gang, instead of > only civil law implications. > It is likely that Rossi and company activities were criminal and not just > bad business practices. > It saddens me to say this about my Italian compatriots but all the > evidence points to the fact that Rossi did it again: another criminal scam. > > Giovanni > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> But this is the point: You can't prove that we live in an Objective >>> Universe. You can't prove that you're not in some computer simulation . . . >>> >> >> True. But you don't have to prove it. You just have to show it is very >> likely, with the fewest entities (Ockham's razor). Science is not about >> absolutes, or perfect assurance. >> >> Some philosophers of science go so far as to say that whether something >> is objectively true in the real world does not even matter, as long as it >> is true as far as you can tell, or more true than any rival hypothesis. You >> can't tell if it is "really" true, and it doesn't matter. True enough is >> good enough. >> >> - Jed >> >> > >
