Who is the guy that got the doctorate in nuclear engineering? Rossi is likely lying and misleading about this or at minimum being sloppy as usual. In Italy we have Laurea (that is like a master that you start after high school) that in a hard field like physics or engineering can take up to 6-7 years. A Dottorato di Ricerca happens after the Laurea and it is highly selective. You need to do real research and publish to receive a Dottorato and it really cannot be less that 3 years given you have to get the data, write the dissertation and publish. Given that high school usually ends in Italy when you are about 19 years old it is unlikely that this guy that Rossi mentions (without giving a name) has a Doctorate. Probably just a Laurea. But this shows again how misleading, clueless Rossi can be even in secondary details like this.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:44 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Either Rossi or IH are lying. I hope the ERV's report will shed some > light on who is telling the truth. > > > On 8/14/2016 11:31 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > > (1) Rossi might not be telling the truth. (2) Rossi does not really answer > Rends's question. :) > > Eric > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:05 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> Eric, I had read your comment before answering. >> Further to my comment about the negative things written about Rossi and >> the ERV on this blog, particularly by Jed giving IH's point of view, it >> might even up the score a little to show what Rossi wrote recently. >> >> >> 1. Andrea Rossi >> August 13, 2016 at 5:45 PM >> >> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=151#comment-1216786> >> >> Felix Rends: >> I have dedicated to this work the second part of my life and part of >> my health. I am no more the same of one year ago. >> About the Lugano Report: the test has not been made by me, nor has >> been the report and for the truth of it speaks the life of the nuclear >> physicists that made it, their honesty, their professional skill matured >> in >> two among the highest rated Universities and in the CERN of Geneva where >> all of them have worked. About the test of one year of the 1 MW Plant, the >> measurements have been made for one year by a nuclear engineer, who got >> his >> doctorate in nuclear engineering when he was 23 years old in the >> University >> of Bologna with 110/110 summa cum laude, then worked as a nuclear engineer >> in a nuclear power plant, then, taking advantage of such experience, >> became >> a professional specialized in certifications and validations of industrial >> plants and industrial products. He has been chosen, as proven by copious >> documents, in agreement between IH and us to make the ERV and he made it >> with all his professional skills and with the integrity that characterized >> all his life, that is immaculate under any point of view, as I >> investigated >> when I knew him because I had to choose a trusted professional to make the >> safety certification of my products years ago; he resulted to be the best >> in absolute among all his colleagues for preparation, honesty, >> confidentiality. This is also the reason why he has been chosen to make >> the >> ERV, in agreement between IH and us. By the way, IH has totally agreed >> upon >> his report released after 3 months of test, and has cited such report in >> interviews released by Tom Darden. Same thing happened after 6 months of >> test, when the second quarterly report has been released by the ERV, same >> thing again happened after 9 months, when the ERV released the third >> quarterly report: please note that during 9 months of the test IH >> repeatedly accompanied to visit the test their investors, explaining to >> them how the ERV was measuring the performance, showing the seals of the >> flowmeter, showing the temperature measurement system ( agreed upon >> directly between Mr Tom Darden and the ERV) and IH collected many million >> dollars of investments from Woodford after the officers of Woodford >> visited >> the test twice, during the first 9 months, and repeatedly accompanied >> Chinese top level investors and engineers to visit the test. The results >> of >> the first three quarterly reports, obviously, were substantially equal to >> the results of the fourth and final report, that IH now is renegating. >> Eventually, IH paid the first three quarterly reports, but did not pay the >> final one. The first three reports determined the allowance to IH of >> enormous investments and they loved them. The fourth report determined the >> obligation of IH to pay us and they discovered the results were wrong: >> what >> a strange coincidence. >> You have my honour word that what I wrote here is the truth. >> I totally sympathyze with you and with all the persons like you and >> also this is why I work like a beast, even now that is Saturday, as >> tomorrow Sunday, and always on this endevour.. >> After all these years you merit to go in a shop and buy an E-Cat, >> damn ! >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> P.S. >> Let me add that both the tests of Lugano and Doral have been >> performed for long timespans, respectively 1 month and 1 year, with the >> obvious consequent considerations. >> >> >> >> >> On 8/13/2016 8:29 PM, Eric Walker wrote: >> >> On Aug 13, 2016, at 19:21, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >> <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> Come on Eric. The basic case is that Rossi said IH failed to pay him. >> Obviously if there had not been a contract IH would have answered it that >> way. >> >> Have you had a chance to read the answer yet? If not, I highly recommend >> you do. The denials of allegation are for the most part extremely succinct, >> and they are numerous. Despite that, IH straight up say that Rossi did not >> meet the terms of the GPT. Perhaps they are lying in their Answer, >> presumably a very dumb thing to do. I'm not betting on that. >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> > >
