In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:50:44 -0800: Hi Russ, [snip] >Mischugenons however unlike 'hydrinos' do produce irrefutable isotopic >shifts in recipient nuclei,
During Hydrino fusion, two things can happen:- 1) A proton fuses with the target nucleus, resulting in a change of element. or 2) A proton & an electron fuse concurrently with the target nucleus resulting in an isotope shift in the original element, since essentially they combine to create a new neutron. This is enhanced electron capture. Enhanced, because the electron is severely shrunken, making it much easier to capture than a normal atomic electron. >though the quantity of shifted isotopes is much >lower lower or higher? >than the apparent mischugenon flux as measured/inferred by the >resulting weak emissions! Perhaps a 'third' miracle is needed, oh shit, will >it ever all be revealed. > >-----Original Message----- >From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear >spallation and resonance > >In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:53:41 -0800: >Hi Russ, >[snip] >>Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing >>reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka >>reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting the >>lack of 'energetic gamma'-less absorbing of neutrons save perhaps >>invoking quasi-dark matter-like behavior, nah... ;) Perhaps said >>resonant conditioned mischugenon/neutrons would behave somewhat like >>normal neutrons and be captured preferentially by nuclei according to >>their neutron capture cross-section resulting in only rather weak >>emissions. Such beasties would be revealed by the pattern of measurable >>though weak emissions increasing as they passed through thin foils of >>metals with increasing neutron capture cross sections, I can live with that >:) That's a neat experiment and result! >>http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2013/05/04/edward-teller/ > >Are you the "I" in this tale? > >As for "mischugenons" they sound a lot like well shrunken Hydrinos. Not as >small as neutrons, so they penetrate the electron shells of atoms less >easily, and need to tunnel into the target nucleus, reducing the reaction >rate. When they merge with a target nucleus, the resultant energy can be >carried by the accompanying electron, or by the other proton if the initial >particle was a Hydrino molecule. The latter possibility in particular might >account for a considerable reduction in emitted gammas (by many orders of >magnitude). > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
