I suggest that the ultra dense hydrogen based quasiparticle might be considered the hydrino. But not only hydrogen can form the ultra dense form. Water can also assume the ultra dence from as produced in cavitation.
The water crystal discovered by Mark Leclair gives cavitation the ability to erode any substance even including diamond because of the unsurpassed hardness of the water crystal's impenetrable spin wave shield that surrounds and protects this UD crystal. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > My dear friend Jones, Let me beat this horse one more time with Naudts > suggestion that the hydrino and by extension, dense hydrogen, are all > relativistic forms of hydrogen and your trepidation about suggesting time > dilation is the only single effect that explains all the anomalies from the > EM drive to modified half lives of radioactive gas when catalyzed ...As for > below absolute zero temperatures this goes away if the observation is not > in the same frame as the UDD.. I may be extending Naudts claims to the > limit but would suggest the temp never goes below absolute zero for the > local nano observer collocated in the same frame as the UDD. > > Fran > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 9:58 AM > To: Vortex List <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero" > > Dense hydrogen is nothing if not cold. Its deflated electron, its sole > contact with the world, has lost most of its angular momentum. How cold > is UDD or UDH, and can it remain cold on contact with adjacent warm > matter? That is the start of a house of cards - to be presented below. > > Last year a thread here touched on the reality of temperatures "below > absolute zero" and the early experimental evidence for such: > > http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-gas-goes-below-absolute-zero-1.12146 > > ...where it was stated in a prestigious journal that a peculiarity of > the below-absolute-zero gas is that it mimics 'dark energy,' the > putative anti-gravity force which pushes Universal expansion against the > inward pull of gravity. This leads to an interconnection between dark > matter and dark energy - both being ostensibly cold. > > Curiously, achieving ultracold involves laser cooling (aka Doppler > cooling) using coherent photons which are very hot. Several ironies > place the Holmlid experiments within the realm of ultracold (whether he > rejects the concept or not). Another slant on negative temperatures > which fits his situation is the realm of Casimir dimensions (few nm > range): "Evidence for the Existence of 5 Real Spatial Dimensions in > Quantum Vacuum"- Quantum Temperatures Below Zero Kelvin" by Calvet. > > http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Articles/3-1/calvet-final.htm > > Dense hydrogen could be the key to opening an unexplored world of > quantum temperatures below zero K, along with time dilation in a model > that agrees with cosmology and recent findings on a Universal scale. > Moving on to "frangibility"... for those not familiar with the term - it > connotes the failure mechanism of ultracold, like thin ice. The end > result of ultracold dynamics is not fusion, decay or immediate > annihilation of protons into energy, but the quark–gluon plasma (aka > quark soup) which is a state of matter in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) > that can take on the various identities, including that of its longest > lived component - muons. > > There is a semantics issue relative to any experiment having a > persistent "coldness" (zone composed of dense hydrogen) existing in a > relatively hot reactor, yet "refusing" to heat up - seemingly violating > common sense and laws of thermodynamics. The implication is that dense > hydrogen is both cold and experiencing time dilation. Dark energy would > be suspected to exhibit an altered time property (Feynman). > Unfortunately, it may be necessary to invoke both of these far-out > notions in order to explain the muons of Holmlid... but an adequate > explanation from less controversial physics has not been forthcoming and > probably never can be. > > Can dense hydrogen, irradiated by a weak laser beam, really be so > fragile that it fractures into subatomic debris... even assuming it was > "frozen" in the ultracold realm by its own deflated electron? The result > is as if being blasted by a TeV beam. An exponential increase in > magnetic interaction is a factor (from Calvet) which would help to > explain the Holmlid effect– at least when the magnetic field interferes > with QCD color exchange. Importantly, consider the slides of Chernodub: > physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf. > > ... which can be understood to provide the mechanism we are looking for > - for proton frangibility via QCD color exchange in a magnetic field. > The fact that there is a geometric region within iron-oxide catalyst of > Casimir dimensions may be no accident, even if prior attempts to utilize > nano-porosity (without laser irradiation) have failed (e.g. Cool Essence > LLC). > > This is admittedly a house of cards, but as of now - it could be the > only game in town to explain the appearance of muons. If Casimir > geometry is accurately modeled as a fourth power relationship in the > context of local magnetism, the combined effect with laser could push > the field strength at the focal point into the region where nucleon > disintegration is possible from QCD color exchange disruption. That > would be the working definition of "proton ultracold frangibility." > > A final note. Unfortunately, it is likely that the Holmlid effect, at > least as presented above, will not scale up to higher power. It will be > a pity if the efforts to duplicate Holmlid start out with a scaled up > system which fails. The good news is that even the low power system can > be useful. To power a robot, for instance, to human levels of activity > only requires about 100 watts. > > >
