Thanks David, Do you also think it is interesting that it coincides with the Cap warp which several replicated and a few other similar claims...
I can actually take the correlation further, but right there, does that not show that anti-gravity is very likely possible with a circular capacitor? There is a lot of evidence that circular things and circular arrays of things can do things that are extraordinary and unexpected by a single element. This is not out of reach, it can be explained. John Berry On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > John, I found the documentary most interesting. Thanks for including the > link. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sat, Apr 22, 2017 6:36 am > Subject: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish > > I think this group has lost all the open minded interest in the > extraordinary side of science for the most part. > > But there was something that occured on this list a long time ago,where a > circle of HV Capacitors developed a Thrust, it was apparentltly replicated > by I think 3 people in total. > http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html > > I also have heard of 2 independant acconts of similar capacitors losing > weight, more that T.T Brown's work and not in the direction of the positive > only. One had a glass dielectric and yet achieved full weight loss. > > Anyway, there is a Documentary that makes a rather good case for a US > Airforce sauser craft based on precisely this technology, and they aren't > even aware of the "Cap warp" experiments. > > http://www.theeventchronicle.com/editors-pick/zero-point- > the-story-of-mark-mccandlish-and-the-the-fluxliner-ssp/# > <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theeventchronicle.com%2Feditors-pick%2Fzero-point-the-story-of-mark-mccandlish-and-the-the-fluxliner-ssp%2F%23&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGtySmZC4RkwRYcZs5ksXJhNqOzdQ> > > Does that not make a very strong case? > > Anyone here that cares? Or if the breaches to conventional physics aren't > wet and Nuclear this group isn't interested? > > > John Berry >
