Dave, it's not that there is a link between electrostatics and gravity, so much as there is a link between the medium underlying both.
Well over 20 years ago now, I got a good grounding (as an autodidact) in physics. Then a bit over 20 years ago, I came across fringe science claims, I was skeptical at first, but I was fair in my skepticality, or you could say I was also skeptical of my skepticism. So I looked at the evidence and found it overall compelling, so then I went looking for correlations.... And I looked and looked, and I was looking in a very conventional reductive manner, with a device with elements in a circle, I was looking at a single element because there is nothing that could be effected by the circular shape,right? You see, at some level I was aware of a theory that that could be termed "Aether Vortex Theory:, this is something that occurred to many people who looked at this area, even though I'm not aware of anyone promoting it. But I hated the idea of an aether, a medium to the background of space, so looking at correlations that were conventional and reductionist I found...... Almost precisely NOTHING! But, I could not help but see this other "aether vortex" model, this model that at least a 3rd of the people who have been around have said they vaguely considered the same, but they wrote it off. So anyway, I didn't, I was convinced by the strong correlations I saw. But how do you work on something that you can't measure or see or know much of anything about? Through correlation, and eventually, after 17 years after first finding this energy existed, I made an unusual coil and I felt it emit something I could feel! Eureka! And more than that, I could feel it after the power was turned off for some 10 minutes, so I wasn't inadvertently feeling something conventional, and I found most other people could feel it too! As for Antigravity, that is not a technically rigorous term, it is merely something that can be directed to act against gravity, or reduce the pull of gravity or the mass of a vehicle, so it could be a directional thrust, or even a non-gravitational force that pushes away from the planet or many other things. Currently my research seems to have found that all matter and energy is a manifestation of some underlying substance, this in reasonable agreement with a variation of quantum physics that proposes that quantum waves exist in a field, in a substance, it is also in agreement with super-strings .You am familiar with the reality of virtual particles, the lamb shift is an extraordinary example of the reality of these, I highly recommend this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g20JZ2HNZaw Hint; it's the cosmology that's wrong. Anyway what I have found is something very much like virtual particles, except I think they have a different Quanta, they have partial charges but they could be called the ejecta or quantum radiation or wash from the dynamics that make up regular matter. Alas, despite finding that even though people can feel these energies in circumstances with zero possible explanation from the Placebo effect (they feel energy from a hidden device and are stranges in a public place and it's not even a test) most people are not interested because thus far the most useful things I have had it do are healings, similar but more rapid than reported from "Chi" or "Qi-Gong" practitioners or other similar things, and some experiments that have resulted in clear glass and plastic breaking in sync with each other and placing a block of Bismuth charged with this energy on a bench gently a few feel from the glass and plastic that took this instant to both break. But most of my work has been with unpowered coils (I found that a simple change meant they did not need to be powered) and believe it or not, graphics! Yes, light effects the aether or aetheric energies just as matter does, and just as light can etch a circuit into a silicon wafer that becomes a CPU, it can etch aircuit in the aether, a far more subtle medium that matter. With the physical coils, up to 90% of people can feel the energy! With graphics it is at best 60%, but it is had to get people to take that seriously. But I have learnt a lot, and I could go into some of what is happening with the circular array of capacitors. Having said that I don't have the complete picture pet, but I know that part of it is that an "aetheric energy" (note, this is not necessarily energy in the strict sense, it might be more like virtual photons, a thing, but not energy in the thermodynamic sense) that passes up through the center is effected by a field that each plane/plate makes and, this conditions the energy somehow, also energy is moving around in the capacitor, the major limiter to am aether vortex is that aetheric energies that are electron like and aetheric energies that are proton like rend to move in opposite directions and this create several issues, this is undone by having a capacitor which polarizes and separates these energies. One theory I have is that these "virtual" or "Partial" or "other dimensional" charges form a vortex above the craft that makes a type of magnetic field that lifts the whole craft up. It could even be that there are 2 different mechanism which both co-incide in the one form, or that the 2 parts explained above work together in a way I think I can explain, or maybe both. But basically there are a large number of devices that I can explain with 2 different models of explanation. Alas scientists find the whole thing too "woo-woo" even though theoretical physics does predict and allow for such possibilities. To spiritual people it's too scientific. To researchers seeking Free Energy or Antigravity (both which I am convinced are phenomena connected to the aether, not the least because they often show up together with other anomalies and impossibilities) I can't yet say exactly how to engineer the aether to achieve these goals with certainty, even though it is abundantly clear to me that the aether is what makes all so-called "Free Energy" including LENR. To potential funders the ROI is too far off. But I can prove what I say, but who care about a breakthrough if it still needs more work to be useful, even if the potential it has is essentially infinite. Alas, sensitivity is useful for learning how to shift a low of energy from the physical to the non-physical, but it does not give great insight on how to make it physical again. So the biggest scientific breakthrough is sitting here waiting or me to build a competent and proper scale device with real energy input, or waiting for me to discover how to "Macgyver" it with a paperclip, a 9v battery and a magnet. John Berry On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:26 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > John, > I honestly do not understand how an electrical charge is associated with > gravity, but apparently some have observed a link. The fact that > gravitational forces are so weak with respect to electromagnetic forces > tend to suggest that a very tiny coupling between the two would be all that > is required in order to see some effects. > > My current position is one of a skeptical nature since I have not had > sufficient opportunity to pursue the subject. Do you know of any good > links to research papers, etc. that I could follow when time permits? If > these types of interactions are possible then the payoff to society could > be enormous. > > I also find circular like systems such as toroidal fields to possess a > form of 'magic'. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sat, Apr 22, 2017 9:24 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish > > Thanks David, > Do you also think it is interesting that it coincides with the Cap warp > which several replicated and a few other similar claims... > > I can actually take the correlation further, but right there, does that > not show that anti-gravity is very likely possible with a circular > capacitor? > > There is a lot of evidence that circular things and circular arrays of > things can do things that are extraordinary and unexpected by a single > element. > > This is not out of reach, it can be explained. > > > John Berry > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > wrote: > > John, I found the documentary most interesting. Thanks for including the > link. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sat, Apr 22, 2017 6:36 am > Subject: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish > > I think this group has lost all the open minded interest in the > extraordinary side of science for the most part. > > But there was something that occured on this list a long time ago,where a > circle of HV Capacitors developed a Thrust, it was apparentltly replicated > by I think 3 people in total. > http://amasci.com/caps/capwarp.html > > I also have heard of 2 independant acconts of similar capacitors losing > weight, more that T.T Brown's work and not in the direction of the positive > only. One had a glass dielectric and yet achieved full weight loss. > > Anyway, there is a Documentary that makes a rather good case for a US > Airforce sauser craft based on precisely this technology, and they aren't > even aware of the "Cap warp" experiments. > > http://www.theeventchronicle.com/editors-pick/zero-point-the > -story-of-mark-mccandlish-and-the-the-fluxliner-ssp/# > <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theeventchronicle.com%2Feditors-pick%2Fzero-point-the-story-of-mark-mccandlish-and-the-the-fluxliner-ssp%2F%23&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGtySmZC4RkwRYcZs5ksXJhNqOzdQ> > > Does that not make a very strong case? > > Anyone here that cares? Or if the breaches to conventional physics aren't > wet and Nuclear this group isn't interested? > > > John Berry > > >
