Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Jul 7 (9 days ago) to vortex-l https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWHPW3-hlUw
This video describes the search for bremsstrahlung radiation as seen in the MFMP experiment as predicted to occur at the onset of HOLE superconductivity. The bremsstrahlung radiation is produced when electrons are expelled at near the speed of light from the center of the Polariton BEC by the meissner effect when the "Hole superconductivity" first begins and again when the Hole superconductivity is terminated at the end of the LENR reaction, electrons move back into the positive core of the SPP BEC when superconductivity and the meissner effect ends. See https://jorge.physics.ucsd.edu/hole.html The sound is bad in the video, but the experimental search is pictured at 6:00 into the video. IMHO, the bremsstrahlung radiation seen in the MFMP experiment shows the onset of HOLE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY in the Polaritons produced to generate the LENR reaction. Some background Author: Hamilton Carter (Texas A\&M Univ) Do superconductors emit x-rays when they quench? Do holes lead double lives, undressing and pairing up as electrons when it gets cold? Can the London penetration depth be explained by holes lowering their kinetic energy and getting... well... fat? An experimental search is underway for the x-ray radiation predicted by Hirsch's hole theory of superconductivity. Originally proffered 25 years ago as a model for high temperature superconductors,, the theory as it now stands applies to all superconducting materials. The basics of the hole theory of superconductivity will be presented, followed by a review of our experiment's design. You'll come away feeling more comfortable with covalent bonding, hopping amplitudes, Hamiltonians and coherent states. You'll learn about pulsed magnetic fields and x-ray detection techniques. You'll be the envy of your friends at parties as you describe both superconductor theory and cutting edge experiments on the frontier of modern physics with confidence and aplomb. On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 1:17 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil-- > > > > Regarding the observation of gammas at the beginning and end of LENR power > output, it may be that the controlling magnetic field, B. passes through > intensities that allow nuclear transitions without coupling to the > electronic orbital kinetic angular momentum energy and a change of nuclear > potential energy to lattice kinetic energy. > > > > One would expect to see a change in the isotopic composition of the fuel > compared to the composition resulting from LENR without gammas. > > > > In addition the gammas may heat the nano-particles of fuel sufficiently to > quickly change resonances that allowed the reaction producing the gammas > and favoring the coupling in the coherent nano-particle system to the > lattice electrons. > > > > IMHO the function of transient SPP BEC’s would not be 100% effective at > shielding gammas routinely produced by a LENR nuclear isotopic transition. > > > > > The production of neutral muons or other neutral subatomic particles > without gammas may be an unrealized problem of some LENR reactions, > however. I consider energetic neutrons, if produced, would be readily > observed. > > > > Bob Cook > > *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Tuesday, July 11, 2017 5:45 PM > *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled > > > > Gamma's were also seen at reaction shutdown. What produces those gammas? > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I believe gammas are generated and then absorbed into the BEC, sliced > and diced into X rays. That is, the vast majority of the gammas. > Some poke their heads through, especially in the initial phase where > it's an endothermic reaction starting the whole thing. That's why > Celani saw Gammas at Rossi's demo, but only at the outset. > > > On 7/11/17, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Gamma rays are not generated in LENR reactions because the reaction > energy > > is completely drained by the entanglement of the SPP BEC that is in place > > on the nanoparticles that produce the LENR reaction. > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I have thought for a long time that there have been multiple LENR > >> reactions. When you let loose a gamma inside a lattice and it hits > >> those other nickel (or palladium) atoms, it generates fission > >> reactions. The ash analysis results have been all over the board. > >> > >> On 7/11/17, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I now believe that there is multiple LENR reaction types. For example, > >> > Rossi has developed a low temperature LENR reaction and has tested it > >> > in > >> > the yearlong IH test. The mechanism for this type of LENR reaction is > >> based > >> > on magnetic flux line focusing by the hexagonal based lattice of mica. > >> This > >> > reaction mechanism follows along the lines that was shown to be > >> > effective > >> > in the Golden Balls of D. Cravins where the magnetic flux lines of a > >> SmCo5 > >> > magnet is focused by the hexagonal based lattice of graphite. > >> > > >> > See > >> > > >> > https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16184 > >> > > >> > This article explains how magnetism can be focused into skyrmion > >> > magnetic > >> > textures involving topological, non-topological and instanton droplets > >> > driven by spin-transfer torque in materials with perpendicular > magnetic > >> > anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Interaction > >> > > >> > During the year long test, Rossi has stumbled on the plasma phase LENR > >> > reaction and has built the QuarkX reactor to take advantage of this > >> > reaction type. Rossi has come to believe correctly that the plasma > type > >> > LENR reaction is superior to the low temperature LENR reaction type > and > >> has > >> > in effect tossed the low temperature technology in the trash as > >> > noncompetitive. > >> > > >> > The QuarkX technology is very difficult because it demands very high > >> > temperature structural materials. This requires specialized expertise > >> > in > >> > material science and extensive testing to ensure the robustness of > this > >> > material under extreme stress over time. > >> > > >> > The plasma based LENR reaction is centered on the production of > >> > nanoparticles produced by the condinsation of metal vapor. Polaritons > >> > naturally form on those nanoparticles that convert the spin of > infrared > >> > photons into powerful magnetic fields. > >> > > >> > By the way, I believe that the SunCell is using the plasma phase LENR > >> > reaction. Like Rossi, R. Mills has stumbled on this reaction type and > >> > is > >> > attempting to bring it to market. > >> > > >> > I am saying that if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a > >> nail. > >> > If Mills encounters unexplained plasma based high energy reaction, it > >> > is > >> > human nature to reform and modify your existing thinking to > incorporate > >> > that reaction into those existing theories. Mills would naturally > >> > resist > >> > rejecting all his ideas formed over a lifetime and that are central to > >> the > >> > survival of his company whether they are valid or not to impartially > >> > include a these new experimental results. > >> > > >> > On top of that, it is in the commercial interest of Mill’s company to > >> avoid > >> > any nuclear based theory that would restrict his ability to patent his > >> > experimental results or taint his work with the onus associated with > >> LENR. > >> > > >> > To top things off, sooner or later, someone will test the plasma type > >> LENR > >> > reaction for muon generation, and when the government finds out that > >> muons > >> > are being produced in massive amounts, then the government will take > >> > over > >> > the LENR tech and produce a muon activated thorium based large scale > >> > centralized grid connected gigawatt level fission power station. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:55 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> If that is true then Rossi either lacks the ability to interpret his > >> >> own > >> >> data or he intentionally misrepresented his data. > >> >> > >> >> Harry > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> You're probably right. But there is evidence he had a COP > 1 for > >> >>> some length of time according to the report by the person chosen by > >> >>> both sides to administer the test. > >> >>> > >> >>> On 7/10/17, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > Rossi was suing IH for millions of dollars, so he had to prove the > >> >>> device > >> >>> > in Florida worked as he claimed. If the trial proceeded I think it > >> >>> > is > >> >>> very > >> >>> > likely that the preponderance of the evidence would not support > his > >> >>> claim. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Harry > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell < > >> jedrothw...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> On 7/9/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >>> OJ Simpson... > >> >>> >>> > Obviously he was guilty. > >> >>> >>> ***Then obviously Rossi is Not Guilty of Fraud. You just > agreed > >> >>> >>> with > >> >>> >>> the legal standard. > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I cannot judge legal standards. By scientific standards and by > >> common > >> >>> >> sense standards he is guilty of fraud. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> > All I did was read the Penon report. That's all it takes. > >> >>> >>> ***Bullshit. Plenty of others have read the report and came to > >> >>> >>> different conclusions than you did. > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Not as far as I know. Some people such as Axil refuse to read the > >> >>> report. > >> >>> >> Others people claim they read it and reached different > >> >>> >> conclusions, > >> >>> >> but > >> >>> >> they have not given any reasons. A few are so gullible they > >> >>> >> believe > >> >>> >> the > >> >>> >> post hoc lies about invisible heat exchangers that do not show in > >> >>> >> photographs. Such "conclusions" are so irrational they have no > >> >>> >> place > >> >>> in a > >> >>> >> serious discussion. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> At least his next intended victims > >> >>> >>> > have the court docket to warn them off. > >> >>> >>> ***Well if you were to write a point by point delineation of all > >> the > >> >>> >>> scientific claims that are fraud then his next "intended > victims" > >> >>> >>> would have that. > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I have no idea what his next scheme will be. Perhaps it will be > >> >>> >> the > >> >>> >> QuarkX? Rossi told Lewan in the interview that he is setting up > in > >> >>> Sweden > >> >>> >> where people want to invest. I suppose that means he has begun a > >> >>> >> new > >> >>> >> scam, > >> >>> >> but maybe he made that up and there are no investors. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> - Jed > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > >
