I am very interested in aethor theories, as well as a replicatable free energy device. I would be a great test, if i can build it, anyone can! heh.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:44 AM, John Berry<aethe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been on vortex for, well not as long as some but I guess, hmmm, might > be over a decade now though, lurking more often than not. > > Anyway it seems that on topic posts are kinda rare, especially if you assume > that the topic is not just alternative sources of energy but IMO things the > "skeptics" would have issues which, physics they would consider impossible, > not just greener forms of energy. > > So as I believe it was originally envisioned this meant: > Perpetual Motion (not technical perpetual motion, rather creation of energy) > Energy from unknown sources. > Negative entropy > Cold Fusion > Antigravity > Other anomalous physics. > > These subjects have with the exception of cold fusion (thanks to Jed) > composed I believe a minority of posts for a long time now. > > Personally my interest is in the aether and I have much evidence for a model > I have developed which explains most everything and roughly how to do almost > anything, but I can not imagine trying to wade into that subject here. > > But there is one bit of my research that we could get into, it is a Free > Energy device that is well replicated and has been replicated by a previous > list member, it can be assembled with off the shelf components. > It seems able to produce useful levels of power far greater than the input. > And it also has a secondary quality that "proves" that something very novel > is occurring. > > In theory manufacture of these could be accomplished very realistically. > > If anyone is genuinely interested I am happy to expand as time permits. > > Also is anyone here genuinely interested in orgne/torsion/aether etc..? > The evidence that it is the very conditioning of space that is key to these > more extraordinary technologies and events (ball lightening for instance) is > overwhelming and they actually with nothing but observation produce an > extremely coherant picture, but in a decade online I have not found really > anyone interested in such. > > >
