Some sort of exception regarding patents should be made for Mills'. The guy obviously has something that the world needs and he literally can not share what he knows! He did make a good faith effort to patent the device but his theory was rejected and patent denied. Later Haisch and Moddel applied for a competing patent that was accepted... What do you think is going to happen when someone points out that Rayney Nickel is just a random array of Casimir cavities?
Fran -----Original Message----- From: Mike Carrell [mailto:mi...@medleas.com] Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 3:44 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces "6th commercial license" July 30, 2009 MC: You won't get much satisfaction from the press release itself. As a BLP watcher, I can offer some unofficial background. The positinve part is that there are now six corporate entities who have seen internal presentations and demonstrations and have made license commitments of varying types. Details of agreements are private. The New Mexico cooperatives obviously have lttle cash and no R&D facilities, but they could be advantageous test sites. Recent Journal papers consolidate years of experiments that refute critics who claim that key signatures of BLP reactions are due to mundane causes. The NaH reaction described on the websit shows that very, very energetic reactions are possible, although that particular one is not a good candidate for scale up to a utility level. Others, more promising, are under development but not released until patent protection is established. Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so. It is probable that as BLP progesses on their current path, a firestorm of criticism and opposition may emerge, and BLP must be prepared for it. Remember the story of the Fleischmann-Pons Effect. Mike Carrell ---- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" <sa...@pobox.com> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces "6th commercial license" July 30, 2009 >I chased the link and didn't get anywhere; it would not open for me. > > Could you summarize -- did they say anything about the cost, if any, of > the license? And did Akridge say anything about plans to construct > anything using the licensed technology? > > Just wondering. > > OrionWorks wrote: >> With all of this incessant prattle concerning the OT topic of UFOs and >> abduction scenarios grabbing much of the Vort bandwidth did anyone >> notice that BlackLight Power has announced its "sixth commercial >> deal?" >> >> http://www.blacklightpower.com/Press%20Releases/BlackLightAkridgeLicenseAgre ementPressReleaseFINAL073009.rtf >> >> http://tinyurl.com/kvewe6 >> >> Excerpt: >> >> ---------- >> >> Cranbury, NJ (July 30, 2009)-BlackLight Power (BLP) Inc. today >> announced the execution of its sixth commercial license agreement and >> first with Akridge Energy, LLC (Akridge Energy), based in Maryland. In >> a non-exclusive agreement, BLP has granted Akridge Energy a license to >> use the BlackLight Process and certain BLP energy technology for the >> production of electric power in Maryland, Virginia and the District of >> Columbia. Akridge Energy may use the technology to produce electric >> power up to a maximum continuous capacity of 400 megawatts (MW). >> >> ---------- >> >> They appear to have skipped commentary concerning the 3rd, 4th, and >> 5th deals. Wonder what that was all about. >> >> Regards, >> Steven Vincnet Johnson >> www.OrionWorks.com >> www.zazzle.com/orionworks >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department.
