By any reasonable standard, Mills should succeed if he surmounts the present
technical problem, application of acquired knowledge to a 'water engine'
that delivers useful power. That will be unprecedented. Because nobody else
has done it, and the path to it is through his magnum opus, GUTCP, serious
attention must be given to that theoretical work.
GUTCP threatens to render the intllectual investment by generations of
physicists in QM irrelevant. A work of such audacity and scope by one man is
unlikely to be error-free. Still, coming from a MD not a member of the
'club', atttack is probable.
The Obama administration is earmarking substantial funds for 'green' and
'enerrgy' initiatives and recipients are already waiting with mouths agape.
A BLP water engine could grab international attention and lead to loud
squaks. One reason for the attacks on Fleishnann and Pons is that the FP
Effect could divert Congress' attention from funding the hot fusion
programs. Coal states are promoting "clean coal" propjects; the nuclear
fission industry sees lots of fission reactors. Do not be surprised if the
EPA is urged to investigate the toxicity of hydrinos [if they exist, of
course].
In response to Frank, BLP has engaged world-class intellectual property
lawyers to protect its investors, who have put up $60+ million, and want to
be repaid. Deployment of BLP technology worldwide is an immense task, bigger
than any single company, but BLP wants its due share. The technology cannot
remain a 'secret' long, and patents expire. BLP will have a 20 year head
start on competitors, who will find it advangeous to maintain licenses with
BLP. While I was at RCA, I heard a talk by the head of the patent department
whose job it was to arrange lincesing agreements with top Japanese
electronics firms for access to RCA know-how, even though the basic patents
on color televison had expired. RCA derived $100 million annually from
licenses.
Mike Carrell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Horace Heffner" <hheff...@mtaonline.net>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 2:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BlackLight Power announces "6th commercial license" July
30, 2009
On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
Mills has pledged to post progess as possible, and he has done so. It is
probable that as BLP progesses on their current path, a firestorm of
criticism and opposition may emerge, and BLP must be prepared for it.
Remember the story of the Fleischmann-Pons Effect.
Mike Carrell
There should be no firestorm of criticism and opposition if they produce
energy and produce a profit. Nothing succeeds like success. They've had
years, a large staff and facility, University cooperation, and millions
of dollars in investments, with success always anticipated not far into
the future. Why would they not succeed?
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
________________________________________________________________________
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.
