Michel,
        Thanks for the link - I will check it out presently but just to be 
clear (I was sleep deprived in the previous post) I do realize the  goal is 
fusion and was referring to a bootstrap step to get up to those velocities. I 
am assuming there are many such "intermediate step theories" but was trying to 
feel out which, if any, or a combination of all, they are using to guide the 
materials selection for the proposed kit.
Regards
Fran

-----Original Message-----
From: Michel Jullian [mailto:michelj...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 3:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The cost of materials is not a barrier

- codeposition (codep) = simultaneous deposition of Pd and D =
palladium deuteride plating

- "cathode wire" is the metal wire substrate on which codeposition is performed.

For more information, see:
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/projects/tgp/Welcome.shtml and the
documents it links to.

Michel

2009/9/17 Frank <froarty...@comcast.net>:
>
> The codeposition I keep hearing reference to.. this is like SPAWARS plating
> the electrode with a Pd electrolyte simultaneous to the gas evolving? Are we
> just talking about electroplating two metals at once (I know the Pd is in
> solution for some SPAWAR experiments) or does the term codeposition in LENR
> have more signifigance?
>
>
> There was also previous threads about the different kinds of Pd and the need
> for it to be very rigid. How does "plating" stack up to rigid forms of Pd?
> I also investigated platin a porus stainless steel tube briefly and was
> informed that plating had to be electroless to form a membrane - I know you
> aren't seeking a macro membrane but are you "cell loading" on a micro scale
> by trapping the evolving gas? I know I am shy on the proper lingo here but
> am I correct in that you are trying to trap the evolving gas in tiny pockets
> where monatomic gas is free to accelerate while diatomic mobility is
> restricted or immediately torn apart if formed from fast the moving atoms?
>
> Thanks in Advance
> Fran
>
>

Reply via email to