In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:12:32 -0400: Hi,
In short then, you believe it's impossible because "The lowest orbital is kept away from the proton by an intervening stream of virtual particles" ? >Robin, > IMHO all orbital ground states have a balance point between the ambient > ratio of short to long vacuum fluctuations (local curvature of space time) > from event horizons at one extreme to Casimir cavities at the other. The > lowest orbital is kept away from the proton by an intervening stream of > virtual particles similar to Puthoffs model keeping all orbitals from > decaying. That balance point can only appear to change if the curvature of > space time changes but being 3D creatures we remain unaware of temporal > orientation just as chalkboard figures are unaware of depth. I would extend > his model to suggest the particles represent a time axis stream intersecting > our spatial dimensions for only a brief instant we call the "present". From > the time axis perspective we are unaware of relativistic changes because our > atoms change 4D shape such that the vortex between the orbital and the > nucleus at its base remain a constant volume like Ron Mallets coffee analogy > - the faster you stir it >the deeper the vortex gets but the radius of the spinning froth on the coffee >surface seems to get smaller proportional to the depth. > >I think Bourgoins 2006 paper estimating different radial velocities for the >different fractional quantum states fails to make it clear that those >velocities are invisible to that atoms themselves or nearby atoms and strictly >reflects a differential measurement between inertial frames -It is actually >decelerating relative to us outside the cavity because of the broken isotropy >of the Casimir plates making "us" somewhat equivalent to the faster twin >approaching C relative to the slower acceleration fields inside the cavity. >Best Regards >Fran http://www.byzipp.com/hydrino/ > >-----Original Message----- >From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:26 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties > >Hi Fran, > >On your web site you state: > >"The hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a "real" fractional quantum >state (sub-ground state) which is impossible." > >Why is it impossible in your opinion? > >(BTW private email to your email address is rejected for security reasons). > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
