Harry Veeder <hlvee...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Why do they insist on using phase change measurements anyway? There > > are a dozen better ways to measure energy flow. > > > > I think Levi and Rossi did the private flow test in feburary to really > convince > themselves, and not to the arm chair skeptics, that their initial steam > tests > were adequate. > That's right. That is my impression of why they did that. They said that the second test proves the first one was right. I agree. As I said, I was hoping they would publish a better description of that test, including details such as the type of flow meter and graphs of the data. I was expecting they would. It is disappointing that they have not. Their preliminary report was fine as far as it went, but I wish they had published more. They may yet do that. - Jed
