At 09:56 AM 6/22/2011, t...@wonksmedia.com wrote:
The following was submitted to the Journal of
Nuclear Physics Forum
(<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=22#comments>http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=22#comments)
this morning:
<http://psci.us/gold.htm>PSCI-NET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=22#comment-47826>June
22nd, 2011 at 8:53 AM
See
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8QdVwY98E
the steam generated by the E-Cat unit in this
video pprovided by Steve Krivit is roughly the
amount expected from 748 watts (3.4 amps X 220V)
input power. Our home electric water kettle has
a measured input power of 1270 watts, and the
amount of steam generated by the water kettle
exceeds the amount of steam shown in the video
linked above. A qualitative analysis of the
steam output shown in Krivitâs E-Cat demo
video will be compared with our video of the
steam generated by the electric water kettle and
will be made available online at
<http://psci.us/gold.htm>http://psci.us/gold.htm later today.
The Greek Embassy in Washington, D.C., has been notified of these findings.
I'm sure they will be fascinated.
This is inadequate, because the steam exiting the
hose, after three meters of hose, is being
compared, I assume, with direct steam from a
water kettle. Do this with three meters of black
flexible hose, like that in the Krivit video, you
will have something much more interesting.
That is, if the steam actually seen at the end of
the long hose is similar to steam produced by 750
watts, then the actual steam-generating power
must be higher than that. I suspect quite a bit higher.
When the steam condenses, it shrinks enormously
in volume, so what is being seen at the end of
the hose is a pale shadow of the original. Which
is why this whole demo is so shaky.
