I think the 1 MW demo is kind of "perpetuum stabile" second class; cannot work being a too complex combination of unreliable non-controllable components.
I wonder that no one has organized bets re its success/failure Peter (I had been Peter much more time than collega Heckert) On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:32 AM, <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Nachricht ---- > Von: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson <orionwo...@charter.net> > An: Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Datum: 19.10.2011 03:50 > Betreff: [Vo]:Is it possible Rossi has already tested his 1 MW prototype > behind closed doors? > > > I believe it has been conjectured that Rossi has not yet operated his 1 > MW > > demo prototype at 100% capacity. That's what I have assumed is the case > > based on what others have said... or is that what Rossi has stated for > the > > record? I'm not sure on this point. Someone please correct me if I am in > > error. The point being: If Rossi's entire 1 MW array has never been > > activated, then yes indeed there does appear in my mind to be valid > > concerns > > for the safety of curious bystanders who may wander too close to the > > prototype. If it's NOT true, and the 1MW reactor HAS already been "test > > driven" at least a few times (and nothing of an explosive nature > > transpired), then IMO there may be some grounds to give Rossi a teeny > tiny > > little bit of slack. Nevertheless, this all being a scarcely understood > > technology, it is still prudent to classify the prototype as potentially > > dangerous, until proven otherwise. I would still personally keep my > > distance. > > > > > > > > Lately, I can't help but wonder if Rossi hasn't already tested the entire > > array at 100% capacity behind closed doors, precisely to make sure his 1 > MW > > prototype will work as he hope it will on Oct 28. If I were betting the > > entire farm (which Rossi seems to be doing) on making sure my "demo" > > performs as advertised I would make damn sure that I have already > performed > > several rehearsals. Rehearsals & dry runs would be absolutely critical in > > order to impress prospective investors in forking over obscene amounts of > > venture capital, > > > > > > > > I certainly hope Rossi has already rehearsed the whole demo at 100% > > capacity. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone verify or falsify this conjecture of mine? > > > > Something like this cannot been tested behind closed doors. > There must be incredible amounts of steam over Rossis facility in Bologna > if he tested it and this was not reported. > Also there must be an output pipe, large enough and the pipe that was shown > in previous videos was many orders of magnitude too thin. > > > Unfortunately the Focus people and others concentrated to make impressive > images and music but did not watch out for the well known questions and > technical details and did not ask Rossi about this. > So they where not well informed, before they have seen this. > I think the press is not interested to report this seriously. > As longer as this story goes on the more money they make from it. Probably > they know already what finally comes out. > The 1 MW plant cannot work in my opinion. > > Best, > > Peter > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
