> It is > irrational to demand 1,000 times more energy than chemistry can produce when > you have already seen 10 times more. The point is already proven. > I think many responsible and capable people don't believe that. The only absolutely determinative test is an independent one that rules out hidden methods to power the device.
But if Rossi made a much longer than what you believe to be strictly necessary (with proper controls and continuous total input power metering including the RF device) it would help a lot. In that, I agree with NASA's scientist.
