On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<aussieguy.e...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 11/20/2011 2:30 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
>
>> What Rossi could do would be twofold.  First, ally himself with some deep
>> pockets.
>>
>
> Deep pockets? How much deeper can you get but the military?


I agree.  If the military bought it and repeated the buy, I'd believe it's
real.  The military isn't reliable for due diligence the first time
around.  The US military bought $8K worth of Sniffex explosive detectors to
test even though they are dowsing rods.  And the Iraqi military bought $60
million's worth until it became an international scandal resulting in
several arrests.  But if the US military bought it and liked it, I'd be
convinced.

The problem is that there is not a shred of evidence to lead anyone to
believe that any military bought anything from Rossi.  If you have some,
please share it.



> Who Rossi now claims bought the first and the next 13 x 1 MW E-Cat plants.
> I doubt the military would wish to see Rossi's trade secrets becoming
> public knowledge. They can easily take control of any patent Rossi has or
> will have.


I suppose the military can temporarily suppress patents where release would
affect national security in a profound way but I think the history of it is
that it's not a possibility that has been used very much and when it has,
it was brief.


> Given a convincing demo in the course of a "due diligence" examination,
> that should be easy.
>
> I suggest he did that on 28 Oct 2011 via the test conducted by the NATO
> Colonel.
>

Oh my.  You fell for that claim line, hook and sinker.  How do you know the
Italian dude with the mustache (Fioravanti was it?) was a NATO colonel
exactly?  Have you seen his military ID?  And if he was such a person,
especially but not necessarily retired, could he not still be also on
Rossi's payroll for a little while?

Reply via email to