It seems that many e-cat believers have almost a religious attitude towards this topic. Anything that a rational mind would interpret as evidence of the non existence of god (working e-cat) is used by the believer in fact as evidence.
The Heaven explained by modern astronomy is not anymore the ethereal world where the souls go and where the angels fly? Of course the real Heaven is in a spiritual dimension. In the case of e-cat we could say that the evidence showing that the corporations associated with Rossi have strange websites, buildings that don't correspond to industrial facilities and so on is for the believer evidence that Rossi is trying to keep his "real" facilities protected from the "evil eyes" of all his enemies. The real facilities are in undisclosed "real" locations , maybe in some Antarctica secret cave, just near by the Nazi's UFO labs. What would take for the believers not to believe any more? G On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:31 PM, ecat builder <ecatbuil...@gmail.com> wrote: > The registered address is the physical address for the Agent for the > company, which can receive corporate mail on behalf of the > corporation. In this case, the agent is Travis, James R, at 8 Town > Farm Rd. He is an agent for multiple corporations. Lots of small > companies set up a business this way--with a PO box, and, when > required, a physical address with an agent. (New laws require a > permanent address for officers and agents of the corporation.) > > Rossi has obvious plans to grow exponentially in the next few years. > The process will typically involve multiple moves to larger and larger > facilities, as his business needs change. The secret facility that he > will use to build e-cats is not likely to be already leased and listed > as an official address for the corporation. > > I'm all for a little snooping around to get corporate intel, but I > personally am more interested in where he builds his e-cats, where he > is hiring, who he is selling to, and the progress he is making on > getting his products out the door and into the hands of consumers.. > rather than the tired "this is more evidence of fraud" crowd. (MY, > that would include you.) > > - Brad > >
