JC,
IMHO the resonance as mentioned by Mark, and the Rydberg
matter as mentioned by Axil, are both "involved" in supplying this million
fold energy gain you require but are not the "source". I do like that you
referred to " the random atomic motion" because it is actually just that
chaotic motion of hydrogen gas when confined inside the Ni powder that
accumulates your energy in what may be our first glimpse of a Heisenberg
Uncertainty trap. Both Mill's skeletal catalyst and Rossi's nano powder form
geometries that displace larger virtual particles which lowers the total
energy density of space time in these "suppression" regions. Catalytic action
only occurs where there are openings or changes in these geometries which is
why these geometries are so critical and easily degraded. An ideal Casimir
cavity has a rather steady energy density except near the slab edges and
therefore very little catalytic action, but, if you were to corrugate the
boundaries so the energy density between them varies you would have a synthetic
catalyst [like the Haisch - Moddel prototype]. This means much care must be
taken to maintain rough grainy boundaries as the working environment but still
need to provide rapid relative motion of the hydrogen to the boundaries, This
is why Mark focused on resonance which instead of a direct current stream of
hydrogen circulation through the bulk powder equates to an alternating stream
of the hydrogen sloshing back and forth through the powder. [a static fill as
Jones Beene refers to it as opposed to a messy external path and pump assembly.
H2 recombination has a high energy release and my posit remains that existing
heat and vigorous catalytic action can discount the energy needed to
disassociate the newly formed molecule at over unity. This requires a careful
balance of temp near disassociation, an agitator like Rossi's RF to move the
hydrogen and heat extraction to protect the geometry and cool the hydrogen back
into recombination in an endless cycle. Axil's Rydberg hydrogen and my own
inverse Rydberg hydrogen are born from the environment. Jan Naudts said the
hydrino was relativistic but didn't say how which led me to interpret Casimir
effect as relativistic. The environment makes the hydrogen appear relativistic
without the need for speed - more of a segregation where regions of reduced
density form inverse Rydberg matter while balancing regions of increased
density form Rydberg matter.
See http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg58001.html
IOW a kind of maxwellian demon based on change in vacuum energy density that
discounts the disassociation threshold of dihydrinos but allows hydrino motion
unopposed.
Fran
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 11:58 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:LENR Presentation by Joseph Zawodny, NASA Langley
Research Center Edit
Joshua wrote:
"So, random atomic motion representing a fraction of an eV per atom is somehow
supposed to be concentrated by a factor of much more than a million by some
resonant phenomenon."
ABSOLUTELY POSSIBLE.
You are reasoning from the physics of brute force, which is all that nuclear
physicists know. The physics of resonance can achieve the extreme energy
levels required with very small, but properly timed/oriented, inputs.
Tesla generated electrical discharges over 130 feet long when in Colorado
Springs in 1899. That represents many 10s of millions of volts when his
primary coil was operating at some very small fraction of that. He had VERY
crude materials to work with and very limited electrical equipment (much of
which he had to build). Despite the primitive resources, he was able to
generate the EXTREME voltages and currents >>> >>BECAUSE OF RESONANCE<<<<<.
Ever hear of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw
For most, theory is a transparent box... those inside don't know they're
inside, or that there's even an outside!
-Mark
