Again, I am not sure. Looking at the slide on p.105 at JCF12 Abstracts at-- http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2011/JCF12/JCF12ExtendedAbstracts.pdf -- I see the reaction "59Ni + e- ----> 59Co + v + Q" I cannot read Japanese, but this looks like a "heavy electron" capture, but that is just a guess. Pardon if I misinterpreted.
Daniel Rocha wrote: > No, Takashi used the weak force in the sense of finding a cross section > for the reaction electron proton, but he laid a very harsh criticism on WL > theory and make it clear the difference between the approaches. In fact, > he didn't take WL seriously. > > 2011/12/30 <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> > >> Daniel, you may be correct. >> I do not know. >> >> However, both Akito Takahashi and Hideo Kozima may regard W-L viable. >> See -- "Second Cold Fusion Theorist Cites Widom-Larsen Theory" >> >> http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/23/second-cold-fusion-theorist-cites-widom-larsen-theory/ >> >> Takahashi appears to be one of the founding members of the Cold Fusion >> Energy, Inc. (CFEI) consortium - along with Hagelstein, McKubre, >> Storms,... >> See -- http://www.cfeis.com/ >> >> Daniel Rocha wrote: >> > I started with stage 2 of negation and went to 1... >> > >> > 2011/12/30 <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> >> > >> >> Lewis Larsen considers some of the criticisms of LENR theory by CF >> >> dogmatists ironic. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cold-fusioneers-new-ploy-ad-hoc-redefinition-of-technical-term-fusiondec-30-2011 >> >> >> >> Too bad it's human nature to form opposing-warring factions. >> >> Perhaps some relic of Darwinian selection? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Daniel Rocha - RJ >> > danieldi...@gmail.com >> > >> >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
