No problem:
Dick Smith published the entire back and forth with Defkalion, which was
published on Ecat News. See the below blog for the entire story. Defkalion
then posted a reply to their forum and that was it. Dick Smith just
imagined an issue and backed away as quickly as possible.
See http://ecatnews.com/?p=2068
Hope that helps.
Ransom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Xavier Luminous" <xavier.lumin...@googlemail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan drops his support of Rossi
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Randy Wuller <rwul...@freeark.com> wrote:
And that comment is actually very misleading. Dick Smith didn't even
bother
to try an negotiate anything with Defkalion. He backed away almost
instantly when they in principal accepted his offer. The idea he could
test
without an NDA of some sort is ridiculous. Certainly Defkalion would have
a
right to protect some aspects of information disclosed to or discovered by
testers and they never ever suggested results of the tests would be
governed
by an NDA. Dick Smith is not serious about this and has a preformed bias
about what is happening.
Could you (or anyone) post the actual terms that were rejected?
Ransom
----- Original Message ----- From: "Xavier Luminous"
<xavier.lumin...@googlemail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan drops his support of Rossi
2012/3/16 Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com>:
Hyperions, then there is no reasons to doubt their words. (Too bad that
Dick
Smith cancelled the opportunity to test hyperions rigorously, if he had
not,
then we already would know whether Hyperions are real or phoney.)
That's a little misleading. If I remember correctly, Dick Smith
cancelled because Defkalion didn't agree to full disclosure of the
test results (or something like that)
