Apple is probably secretly working on 'ifusion'. Harry
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: > We don't know what it is. When we do, maybe "resonant fusion?" "proton > absorption?" BEC fusion" > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's a question with many nuances. I generally agree with Jed about the > realities and the regulatory issues. > > Yet at the same time, we have an example: the terminology change from NMR to > MRI. It was significant from perspective of consumer acceptance, and > therefore it was economically significant. If we believe LENR will be > incorporated in consumer products, then words probably do matter. > > Jeff > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 7:28 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I tend to agree with Axil, i think the nanopowder is a distraction if you >> want to generate power. Powder may be mainly good for transmutations and >> maybe heat transfer. >> >> I think both a Papp type engine and possibly the Terrawatt Research >> magnetic drive are an impulse/shock type drive with charge, compression and >> magnetic alignment all repeated at high frequencies. The Papp motor runs at >> about 47 Hz and the Terrawatt unit shows data up to 20 Hz with a steep power >> curve from there. The Papp unit uses noble gasses and the terrawatt >> magnetic oscillator just has an air gap between rotating magnetics. >> >> There must be an issue though (besides fraud which i do not believe). >> Since the UL data for TWR was from 2008 it should not take that long for the >> Terrawatt drive to make it to market. >> >> The think issue is either safety or reliability or both. This may be that >> the system will generate an UNGODLY amount of power at 100 or 150 Hz >> destroying itself and those around it. I also wonder what type of EMR >> spectrum of emissions is generated during operation and whether that is >> healthy. Papp at some point seemed to give up either after the explosion >> and somebody was killed or after he became ill with cancer. >> >> Patterson also seemed to give up on launching a product after his grandson >> died that was helping him. >> >> This all seems very strange to me. All of these systems seemed to have >> the potential to transform the world and yet their development appears >> delayed or halted. Maybe I am making too much of it. Jed might know some >> of the history better. >> >> Stewart >> >> >> >> On Friday, August 31, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: >>> >>> We think we know what is going on. Do we? >>> >>> >>> >>> One must remain open. >>> >>> >>> >>> I agree, being open minded is important. >>> >>> >>> >>> It's important to not permit the SCAMS of yesterday to effect the LENR >>> systems of tomorrow. >>> >>> >>> >>> The noble gas reaction that underpins the Papp engine is the most likely >>> reaction that works and the most promising. It must receive priority in >>> future LENR R&D funding. >>> >>> Cheers: Axil >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> <blush> >>>> >>>> Don't forget the crater in the floor in Salt Lake City and the explosion >>>> in >>>> Tadahiko Mizuno's experiment. Key on "explosion" in the LENR-CANR.org >>>> search window. >>>> >>>> We think we know what is going on. Do we? >>>> >>>> One must remain open. >>>> >>>> T >>>> >>> >
