I read Mr. Godes paper the day it appeared on the New Energy Times site (I think that was back in July?). I immediately had the feeling it was important. At the same time, the word "proprietary" appears six times. It seems clear that Mr. Godes believes the road to progress is a working device, not scientific replication. And I'm not criticizing. In fact given the way the mainstream scientific community has treated LENR for the last 20+ years, it sounds like the path to poetic justice.
As always, time will tell. Jeff On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Ruby <r...@hush.com> wrote: > Mark, I did this Q&A with Robert Godes July a year ago. > > I had already spoke with him one-on-one in an interview I could not > publish about early January 2011 (before the Rossi demo). > > Though the electrolytic cell generated a small COP, he had 100% > reproducibility then, turning on and off on-demand. > > But look what a certain agency said about this technology being "instant > death". And that is not the half of it. > > "*With steady progress meeting each company milestone, the lab runs with > a skeleton staff, including volunteers. Negative perceptions about the > field of LENR research have discouraged potential investors. One possible > private donor seeking a technical evaluation was informed by a **National > Science Foundation** member (whose review entailed “a quick scan” of the > Brillouin Energy website) that it was “quite possible they had created the > ‘instant death’ version of cold fusion”. * " > > http://coldfusionnow.org/funding-dam-breaks-for-brillouin-boiler-that-uses-water/ > > > Ruby > > > > > On 9/18/12 11:20 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote: > > If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the > poster child for CF/LENR?! And why hasn't the CF/LENR research community > exhaustively investigated the system and built working models that would > show, irrefutably, that CF/LENR is real? In following this list I've read > about scores of theoretical systems and theories that it seems no one has > actually made work reliably and here you're claiming the Godes/McKubre > system not only works but works reliably! > > Can anyone explain why this system isn't being refined and promoted at > the very least as proof of CF/LENR? > > [mg] > > > >> There may have been a few poorly documented reports of 100% success >> that I suspected were 100% instrument artifacts. >> Normally I would be very suspicious of an effect that appears every time, >> on demand. But when it comes from a a top-notch lab such as SRI I am not >> going to worry about it. >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Ruby Carat > > r...@coldfusionnow.org > United States 1-707-616-4894 > Skype ruby-carat > www.coldfusionnow.org >
